Elastomeric Impact Deceleration Device for Material Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Material handling equipment (MHE) frequently experiences impacts while navigating in warehouses, leading to potential damage to loads and injury to drivers, with existing solutions like sensors and deformable bumpers failing to effectively mitigate deceleration forces and maintain usability.

Innovation Solution

A MHE impact deceleration device comprising an elongate outer and inner profile made of elastomeric materials with varying shore resistance, allowing for adjustable deceleration forces during collisions, and featuring air chambers and removably fastening belts for easy installation and replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a steel bumper is used to absorb impact energy, then the protective capability is improved, but the bumper remains deformed after collision leading to non-usability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidbumper reusability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from rigid steel to elastomeric material, which allows the bumper to absorb impact energy through elastic deformation and return to its original shape, enabling repeated use without permanent deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite elastomeric materials with different shore resistances (hard and soft components) to create a bumper that combines energy absorption capability with shape recovery, resolving the contradiction between strength and reusability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If a single-material elastomeric bumper is used, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the deceleration performance at different impact speeds is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddeceleration performance across speed ranges
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite elastomeric materials with different shore resistances (hard and soft components) to create a bumper that combines energy absorption capability with shape recovery, resolving the contradiction between strength and reusability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the elastomeric body into regions with different material properties (hard and soft elastomeric materials) to provide optimized local response for different impact conditions, improving overall reliability while maintaining integrated manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If sensors are used to warn drivers of approaching obstacles, then the safety awareness is improved, but the sensors constantly produce false signals at close distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safety awarenessVSAvoidsensor signal accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a passive elastomeric bumper as an intermediary safety device that physically absorbs impact energy rather than relying on active sensing systems, eliminating false signals while providing continuous protective function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the electronic sensor-based warning system with a passive mechanical elastomeric bumper that provides direct physical protection, eliminating the problem of false signals while maintaining safety functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively reduces deceleration forces during impacts, maintains its shape post-collision, and is easily mountable and replaceable, protecting both the load and driver while minimizing damage and injury.

Implementation Method 1

the outer and the inner profile are made out of an elastomeric material, the elastomeric material of the inner profile having a shore resistance being higher than the shore resistance of the outer profile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the outer profile at least partially surrounding the inner profile, wherein the outer and the inner profile are made out of an elastomeric material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP2567932B1Impact deceleration device for material handling equipments.
Publication Date: 2017.05.10 INGSBUREAU WUYLENS
  • EP2567932B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to a MHE impact deceleration device (1), comprising an elongate outer profile (2) and an elongate inner profile (3), the outer profile (2) surrounding at least part of the inner profile (3), wherein the outer (2) and the inner profile (3) are made out of an elastomeric material, the elastomeric material of the inner profile (3) having a shore resistance being higher than the shore resistance of the outer profile (2).