Electric Bus Fleet Configuration Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to determine an optimal configuration for electric public transportation systems that balance fleet size, on-board battery parameters, and charging infrastructure, particularly in meeting predefined timetables and geographic route profiles, while considering the interplay between these components and external factors like renewable energy and grid connectivity.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automatically determine the fleet size, on-board battery parameters, and charging infrastructure parameters by simulating electric power consumption, computing battery lifetimes, and optimizing an objective function under constraints, including timetables, geographical route profiles, and external factors like weather and renewable energy availability, to ensure efficient and cost-effective deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the fleet size and charging infrastructure are increased to meet timetables and route profiles, then the reliability and service quality improve, but the cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimetable complianceVSAvoidcharging infrastructure configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying key parameters including fleet size, battery capacity, charging power, and charging infrastructure configuration to find optimal combinations that meet timetable requirements while controlling costs. The optimization process explores different parameter sets to balance reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing comprehensive simulations and optimizations during the planning phase before actual deployment. This allows the system to predetermined optimal configurations for fleet size, battery parameters, and charging infrastructure, avoiding the need for complex adjustments after deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Duration of action of moving object

If larger on-board batteries are installed in electric public transportation vehicles to extend operating range, then the duration of action and route coverage improve, but the weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating rangeVSAvoidbattery weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes battery parameters including capacity and weight by systematically evaluating different battery configurations against operational requirements. The system finds the minimum necessary battery size to achieve required operating ranges while minimizing weight and cost constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by determining that full battery capacity is not always necessary - the optimization may reveal that smaller batteries combined with strategic charging stops at infrastructure locations achieve the same effective operating range with reduced weight and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If charging infrastructure is expanded to support more vehicles and faster charging, then the productivity and fleet utilization improve, but the cost and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefleet utilizationVSAvoidcharging energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes charging infrastructure parameters including charging power levels, station locations, and operational schedules to maximize fleet utilization while minimizing energy consumption. The system evaluates different charging strategies to find the optimal balance between productivity and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by using simulation results to iteratively refine charging infrastructure configurations. The optimization process incorporates performance feedback from simulated operations to adjust charging schedules and infrastructure placement, improving productivity while controlling energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11087422B2Method and device for determining a configuration for deployment of a public transportation system
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 ABB E-MOBILITY BV
  • US11087422B2 patent drawing
  • US11087422B2 patent drawing
  • US11087422B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for determining a configuration for deployment of a public transportation system including a plurality of electric public transportation vehicles, in particular electric buses, are disclosed. At least one processor may determine, prior to deployment of the public transportation system and based on received information on timetables and geographical route profiles, a fleet size of a fleet of electric public transportation vehicles, on-board battery parameters of on-board batteries to be installed in electric public transportation vehicles, and charging infrastructure parameters associated with a charging infrastructure to be installed for charging the on-board batteries of the electric public transportation vehicles.