Electric Differential Torque Control for Split-Friction Wheel Slip

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing differential drive arrangements for electric vehicles struggle to manage wheel slip effectively in varying friction conditions, leading to potential wheel lock and reduced maneuverability, especially in split friction scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A control unit with wheel slip control modules for each driven wheel determines obtainable torque based on current wheel state, including speed and friction conditions, and adjusts torque requests from the electric machine to prevent excessive slip, while service brakes are used to maintain wheel slip within configured limits, allowing for differential locking avoidance and improved traction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a differential allows the outer drive wheel to rotate faster than the inner drive wheel during a turn, then the vehicle's turning capability is improved, but the wheel shafts split wheel longitudinal forces equally which limits the force available from each wheel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning capabilityVSAvoidwheel longitudinal force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing each wheel to have different torque characteristics based on its individual friction conditions. The control system independently manages torque distribution to each wheel, enabling the high-friction wheel to deliver maximum force while the low-friction wheel operates within its limits, rather than forcing equal force distribution on both wheels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If one wheel experiences lower friction than the other wheel, then it takes less torque to turn the low friction wheel, but the low friction wheel decides the longitudinal force possible to generate by both wheels which may not be ideal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel rotation efficiencyVSAvoidlongitudinal force
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically changes the torque parameter distributed to each wheel based on real-time friction condition detection. When split friction is detected, the system adjusts torque distribution to match each wheel's friction characteristics, preventing the low-friction wheel from limiting the overall force generation capability of the drive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If electric machines generate significant torque already at low speeds, then propulsion capability is improved, but severe wheel slip occurs if the requested torque is not carefully controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque generation capabilityVSAvoidwheel slip control
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring wheel speed, vehicle speed, and friction conditions, then adjusting the torque requests to the electric machines accordingly. This closed-loop control prevents severe wheel slip by detecting slip conditions and reducing torque requests in real-time, while still allowing the electric machines to deliver their high torque capability when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts torque distribution based on changing friction conditions detected during operation. The wheel slip control modules continuously update torque requests to electric machines based on current wheel state, allowing the propulsion system to adapt its power delivery characteristics to match instantaneous road conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If service brakes are used to maintain wheel slip within configured limits, then wheel slip control is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel slip controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system achieves multi-functionality by using the service brakes not only for their primary braking function but also as an active component in wheel slip prevention during propulsion. This unified approach allows the same brake system to serve multiple purposes: normal braking, wheel slip control during acceleration, and torque vectoring assistance, thereby managing complexity through functional integration rather than adding separate dedicated slip control actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4090548B1A differential electrical drive arrangement for heavy duty vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.12.13 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • EP4090548B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2
  • EP4090548B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4090548B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A control unit (110) for a heavy duty vehicle (100), the vehicle comprising an electric machine connected to first and second driven wheels via an differential, the control unit (110) comprising a first wheel slip control module associated with the first driven wheel, and a second wheel slip control module associated with the second driven wheel, where each wheel slip control module is arranged to determine an obtainable torque by the respective wheel based on a current wheel state, wherein the control unit (110) is arranged to determine a required torque to satisfy a requested acceleration profile by the vehicle (100), and to request a torque from the electrical machine corresponding to the smallest torque out of the obtainable torques for each driven wheel and the required torque.