Electric Element With Non-Uniform Coil Conductor Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Planar spiral coil components with large aspect ratios formed by electroplating often exhibit nonuniform conductor thickness, leading to significant differences in distance between coil surfaces and the magnet, resulting in inconsistent electromagnetic interactions and characteristic variations between electric elements.

Innovation Solution

The electric element features a substrate with a resin layer and a conductive body having a coil portion with a winding axis orthogonal to the substrate's surface, where the coil conductor has a non-uniform thickness varying along the winding direction, with a smaller difference in distance between the first coil surface and the substrate compared to the second coil surface, reducing variations and enhancing electromagnetic field strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electroplating is used to form planar spiral coil components with large aspect ratios, then the conductor can be formed efficiently, but the conductor thickness becomes nonuniform, leading to significant differences in distance between coil surfaces and the magnet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectroplating efficiencyVSAvoidconductor thickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different conductor thicknesses in different regions of the coil. The conductor is designed with a first thickness in a first region and a second thickness in a second region, allowing each region to have optimized properties for its specific function while maintaining overall manufacturing efficiency through electroplating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If the coil conductor has nonuniform thickness, then manufacturing is simplified, but the distance between coil surfaces and the magnet varies significantly, resulting in inconsistent electromagnetic interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconductor formation simplicityVSAvoidelectromagnetic interaction consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing local quality with specifically designed thickness variations. The conductor has different thicknesses in different regions, but these variations are controlled and optimized to maintain consistent electromagnetic interactions. The first region has a first thickness and the second region has a second thickness, with each region's thickness optimized for its electromagnetic function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the conductor thickness parameter across different regions. The thickness is changed from a first thickness in the first region to a second thickness in the second region, optimizing electromagnetic interaction consistency while maintaining ease of manufacture through electroplating processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If the distance between coil surfaces and the magnet varies significantly, then the structure can accommodate thickness variations, but the electromagnetic field strength and driving force are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural flexibilityVSAvoidelectromagnetic field strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different conductor thicknesses in different regions of the coil. The conductor is designed with a first thickness in a first region and a second thickness in a second region, allowing each region to have optimized properties for its specific function while maintaining overall manufacturing efficiency through electroplating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration stabilizes the characteristics of electric elements by minimizing distance variations between the magnet and the coil surfaces, increasing the electromagnetic field strength and driving force while reducing conductor loss.

Implementation Method 1

the coil portion includes a continuous coil conductor including a first coil surface facing the first principal surface and a second coil surface opposite to the first coil surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic interaction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

increasing the electromagnetic field strength and driving force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11183915B2Electric element
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US11183915B2 patent drawing
  • US11183915B2 patent drawing
  • US11183915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric element includes a substrate including a resin layer and a first conductive body, and a magnet. The substrate includes a first principal surface facing the magnet. The first conductive body includes a coil portion having a winding axis orthogonal to the first principal surface and located on a side closest to the first principal surface. The coil portion includes a continuous coil conductor including a first coil surface facing the first principal surface and a second coil surface opposite to the first coil surface. The coil conductor has a non-uniform thickness in a winding axis direction varying a distance between the first and second coil surfaces, and a difference of maximum and minimum values of distance between the first coil surface and the first principal surface is smaller than a difference of maximum and minimum values of distance between the second coil surface and the first principal surface.