Electric Field Segmentation for Propellant-Free Spacecraft Propulsion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing electromagnetic framework is incomplete in describing forces from charges in relative motion, particularly in exploiting interactions between complex electric fields and static electric fields for propulsion applications.

Innovation Solution

The use of specific electric field equations to split electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames, coupling these equations to produce forces that can propel a spacecraft without propellant, by deriving magnetic fields from these interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the traditional electromagnetic framework using separate magnetic and electric fields is used, then the mathematical framework is simple and well-established, but it is incomplete in describing forces from charges in relative motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of force descriptionVSAvoidcomplexity of mathematical framework
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the electromagnetic field description into two distinct components: complex electric fields (describing forces from charges in one inertial frame) and static electric fields (describing forces from charges in another inertial frame). This segmentation allows the incomplete traditional framework to be completed by adding the missing static electric field component, while maintaining manageable mathematical complexity through the use of separate, well-defined field equations for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames are treated as a single coupled field, then the mathematical framework is unified, but it cannot fully exploit the interactions for propulsion applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to exploit forces for propulsionVSAvoidcomplexity of field equations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the electromagnetic field into separable complex electric field and static electric field components, each governed by its own equation. This segmentation enables independent analysis and exploitation of forces from charges in different inertial frames, making the system adaptable for propulsion applications while avoiding the intractability of a fully unified approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation by introducing separate field equations that account for different inertial reference frames. By parameterizing the electric fields separately according to their respective frames of reference, the system can exploit the full range of electromagnetic forces for propulsion without requiring a single complex unified equation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If magnetic fields are used to describe forces from moving charges, then the framework works for stationary conductors, but it fails to account for forces from charges in relative motion between different inertial frames

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of force description for moving chargesVSAvoidcomplexity of field interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the description of forces from moving charges out of the traditional magnetic field framework and places it into a separate static electric field component. This extraction allows forces from charges in relative motion between different inertial frames to be accurately described without being constrained by the limitations of the magnetic field approach, while maintaining manageable complexity through separate field equations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of forces for spacecraft propulsion using electric currents alone, accounting for materials and shapes of conductors, and overcoming limitations of traditional magnetic field frameworks.

Implementation Method 1

The example method implements the interaction of these electric fields to produce a force on an assembly to propel a spacecraft using electricity without any propellant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

Einstein demonstrated that the electric field was a primary field and the magnetic force that the magnetic field that was created to describe these magnetic forces was really the results of the interaction of electric fields from charges in two different inertial frames of references in a conductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz Force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS10084395B2Complex electric fields and static electric fields to effect motion with conduction currents
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 ELECTRO-SCALAR HLDG LLC
  • US10084395B2 patent drawing
  • US10084395B2 patent drawing
  • US10084395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, a method includes interacting electric fields from charges in conductors in different inertial reference frames to effect motion. The example method implements the mathematical framework that divides electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames into separate electric field equations in electrically isolated conductors. The example method may implement the interaction of these electric fields to produce a force on an assembly that can, by way of illustration, propel a spacecraft using electricity without other propellant(s).