Electric Landing Gear Actuation With Flexible Pull Member

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft landing gear actuation systems rely on hydraulic components, which are cumbersome and prone to failure modes that prevent emergency deployment, necessitating a hydraulic-free electric actuation system.

Innovation Solution

A landing gear actuation system utilizing a flexible pull member attached to a movable member, with an electro-mechanical motor to move the pull member, eliminating the need for hydraulic systems and enabling packaging flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydraulic components are used for landing gear actuation, then sufficient force and control are achieved, but system complexity and failure modes increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency deployment reliabilityVSAvoidhydraulic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the hydraulic system from the landing gear actuation mechanism, replacing it with an electric motor-driven flexible pull member system. This elimination of hydraulic components directly reduces failure modes and improves emergency deployment reliability while maintaining the necessary actuation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the hydraulic mechanical system with an electric-mechanical system consisting of an electric motor, flexible pull member, and associated mechanical linkages. This replacement eliminates hydraulic fluids, pumps, and valves, thereby reducing system complexity and potential failure points while achieving the same landing gear actuation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If hydraulic systems are used for landing gear actuation, then adequate power and control are provided, but space requirements and packaging flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging flexibilityVSAvoidactuation system volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the hydraulic system with its reservoirs, hoses, and actuators, the patent significantly reduces the volume occupied by the actuation system. This extraction enables more flexible packaging arrangements and frees up space within the aircraft structure for other components or optimized layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a flexible pull member (such as a belt or cable) instead of rigid hydraulic actuators. This flexible element can be routed through compact paths and stored in space-efficient configurations, greatly enhancing packaging flexibility while maintaining the necessary mechanical advantage for landing gear actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of operation

If hydraulic components are used, then reliable force transmission is achieved, but weight and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance easeVSAvoidhydraulic component count
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes hydraulic components including pumps, valves, reservoirs, and associated piping from the landing gear actuation system. This extraction eliminates the need for hydraulic fluid management, pressure regulation, and leak prevention, thereby simplifying maintenance procedures and reducing the skill level required for system servicing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The electric motor-driven flexible pull member system is inherently simpler and more self-contained than a hydraulic system. The electric motor provides direct drive capability, and the flexible pull member requires minimal maintenance beyond routine inspection, enabling easier operation and reduced maintenance overhead compared to complex hydraulic assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system allows for efficient extension and retraction of landing gear without hydraulic fluids, reducing failure modes, improving space efficiency, and ensuring reliable emergency deployment.

Implementation Method 1

a spring configured to maintain tension in the flexible pull member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the motor is an electro-mechanical motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromechanical conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

a damper configured to maintain tension in the flexible pull member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12269584B2Landing gear actuation system
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 GOODRICH CORP
  • US12269584B2 patent drawing
  • US12269584B2 patent drawing
  • US12269584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The landing gear actuation system includes an attachment point integral to a movable member, a flexible pull member having a first end coupled to the attachment point, and a motor configured to move the flexible pull member, wherein the movement of the flexible pull member moves the attachment point and the movable member.