Electric Mouse Trap Locking Pressing Device to Prevent Escape

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional electric mouse traps fail to effectively capture mice as they struggle and escape due to instinctive reactions that cause them to disengage from the conductive sheets, leading to a low success rate.

Innovation Solution

A mouse trap design featuring a locking mechanism that secures the mouse pressing device after shocking, preventing the mouse from disengaging from the conductive elements, enhancing the electric shock's effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional electric mouse trap uses conductive sheets to deliver electric shock, then the mouse receives electric shock, but the mouse can turn over or jump up to release from the conductive sheets and escape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemouse trapping success rateVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing device is designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing it to dynamically respond to the mouse's movements. The device can press down on the mouse to maintain contact with conductive sheets during struggle, then release after trapping is complete, adapting its state based on operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing device acts as an intermediary between the mouse and the conductive sheets. It ensures continuous contact by physically pressing the mouse against the sheets, mediating the interaction to prevent the mouse from escaping while avoiding direct complex mechanisms in the electrical circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the mouse pressing device is made movable to press the mouse, then the mouse remains in contact with conductive elements, but the device requires a locking mechanism to control movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact maintenanceVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to automatically engage and disengage based on the operational state. When the mouse triggers the trap, the system automatically locks the pressing device in position; after operation, it automatically releases. This self-service functionality reduces the need for complex manual control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism changes the positional parameter of the pressing device from movable to fixed during operation. By controlling the state transition of the locking element, the system adjusts the degree of freedom of the pressing device, enabling it to maintain contact when needed and release when operation is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the locking element is engaged with the mouse pressing device, then the mouse pressing device movement is limited, but the locking element must be released to allow the mouse to be pressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition stabilityVSAvoidpressing device operability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism operates periodically, alternating between locked and unlocked states. It locks the pressing device during operation to maintain stability, then unlocks to allow resetting and repositioning. This periodic cycling between constrained and free states balances stability requirements with operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The locking mechanism ensures the mouse remains in contact with the conductive elements, improving the capture and shock mortality rate by preventing escape.

Implementation Method 1

the electric shock mechanism uses high-voltage micro-current to make them unable to escape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric shock: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 2

the locking element is capable of moving between a locked position and an unlocked position, and is engaged with the mouse pressing device when the locking element is located in the locked position, so as to limit the movement of the mouse pressing device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP4640050A1Mouse trap
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 SHENZHEN VISSON TECH CO LTD
  • EP4640050A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4640050A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4640050A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A mouse trap includes a shell, which includes a base and an upper housing connected at a top of the base, wherein an electric shock device, a mouse pressing device and a locking device are arranged in the shell; the electric shock device includes a conductive element, the mouse pressing device is movably mounted on the top wall of the shell and extends downwardly towards the base, and the bottom end of the mouse pressing device is located above the conductive element of the electric shock device. The locking device includes a locking element movably installed in the shell, and a driving mechanism for driving the locking element to move. The locking element is movable between a locked position and an unlocked position, and is engaged with or released from the mouse pressing device when the locking element is located in the locked position or the unlocked position, respectively.