Electric Snowmobile Front Suspension Layout for Stable Ski Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing snowmobile designs, particularly those with internal combustion engines, face challenges in optimizing shock absorber placement and geometry due to space constraints, leading to suboptimal shock absorbance and structural endurance, especially when transitioning to electric power sources.

Innovation Solution

A redesigned front suspension structure for electric snowmobiles featuring parallel upper and lower suspension A-arms with rear connection points optimized for the electric snowmobile's frame, allowing for longer shock absorbers and improved shock absorbance, along with an encapsulating body to protect internal components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If traditional internal combustion engine snowmobile designs are used, then long traveling range is achieved, but fuel consumption increases and safety issues emerge in wilderness areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidsafety in wilderness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the internal combustion engine with an electric motor system. The electric snowmobile uses an electric motor mounted on the frame to drive the snowmobile, eliminating the need for fuel tanks and exhaust systems. This substitution reduces fuel consumption to zero while improving safety by removing flammable fuel storage in wilderness areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Volume of stationary object

If shock absorbers are placed in traditional locations in internal combustion engine snowmobiles, then space constraints are managed, but shock absorbance and structural endurance become suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidshock absorbance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent repositions the shock absorbers from traditional horizontal placements to vertical orientations extending downward from the frame. This dimensional change allows the shock absorbers to achieve greater compression distances and improved shock absorbance without compromising the compact space utilization of the electric snowmobile frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of stationary object

If electric motors are integrated into the frame, then space efficiency improves, but heat management becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoidheat dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a heat sink as an intermediary component between the electric motor and the surrounding environment. The heat sink absorbs excess heat generated by the electric motor during operation and dissipates it through its extended surface area, enabling effective thermal management while maintaining the compact integration of the motor within the frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4429934B1Front suspension for an electric snowmobile
Publication Date: 2025.10.15 AURORA POWERTRAINS OY
  • EP4429934B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4429934B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4429934B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to front shock absorbers (4) and related support (i.e. suspension) structures within the frame (9) of an electric snowmobile (1). The structure comprises upper (5) and lower (6) suspension A-arms and a spindle (7) for both skis. A rear connection point (13) for the lower suspension A-arm (6) is placed more to the rear within the frame (9). Also the length of the front shock absorbers (4) is designed to be larger. This design is possible because of more space available in the electrically driven solution. The caster (β) and camber (α) angles may be kept as constant during any compression magnitude of the front shock absorbers (4).