Distributed Electric Tail Rotors With Flight-Based Power Allocation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional tail rotors in helicopters suffer from issues such as blade stall, noise pollution, structural integrity threats, and inefficient power management, particularly due to their fixed rotational speed and mechanical linkage systems, which lead to unnecessary power consumption and imbalance during different flight modes.
Innovation Solution
An electrically distributed yaw control system with a power management module that allocates power between the main power system and tail rotor motors based on flight mode, airspeed, and maneuver detection, utilizing variable speed motors and fixed pitch blades to optimize power usage and reduce noise, while ensuring airframe protection.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Speed
If traditional mechanical linkage systems are used to drive tail rotors at high angular velocities, then adequate aerodynamic response is achieved, but noise pollution increases and power consumption becomes inefficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the traditional mechanical linkage system with an electrically distributed yaw control system using independent electric motors for each tail rotor. This substitution allows precise control of rotational speed, enabling the system to reduce angular velocity during forward flight when aerodynamic response is less critical, thereby reducing noise and power consumption while maintaining adequate control authority through electrical actuation
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements variable speed control for tail rotors based on flight conditions. During hover, tail rotors operate at high angular velocities to provide adequate aerodynamic response. During forward flight, the system dynamically reduces rotational speed to minimize noise and power consumption while maintaining sufficient yaw control capability through the electric motor system
2Power
If power sources are sized to provide peak power values for tail rotors, then maximum power availability is ensured, but component size and weight increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic power allocation that adjusts power distribution to tail rotors based on flight mode and operational requirements. During hover, full power is allocated to maintain high rotational speeds. During forward flight, power allocation is reduced as lower rotational speeds suffice for yaw control. This dynamic approach allows the use of smaller power sources that can deliver peak power when needed rather than continuously sized for maximum peak output
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the operational parameters of tail rotors by controlling rotational speed according to flight conditions. By varying the speed parameter from high during hover to lower during forward flight, the system reduces peak power demands, enabling the use of smaller, lighter power sources while maintaining adequate performance across different flight modes
3Reliability
If multiple tail rotors are used for yaw control, then control authority is improved, but power consumption imbalance and efficiency degradation occur
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by independently controlling each tail rotor's power allocation based on its specific operational requirements and flight conditions. The power management system evaluates the contribution of each tail rotor to yaw control and allocates power locally to each motor, ensuring that rotors operating in less critical conditions consume less power while maintaining overall system reliability and control authority
Solution Approach 2:
The patent dynamically adjusts operational parameters (rotational speed, power allocation) for each individual tail rotor based on flight mode and control requirements. This parameter optimization ensures that multiple tail rotors operate efficiently with balanced power consumption, preventing the efficiency degradation that occurs when all rotors operate at identical high power levels regardless of actual control needs
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The system enhances yaw control efficiency, reduces noise emissions, balances power consumption, and protects the airframe by dynamically adjusting power distribution and rotational speeds, thereby improving overall performance and safety during various flight conditions.
Implementation Method 1
Each of the tail rotors includes a variable speed electric motor capable of changing revolutions per minute (RPMs)
Data Source
AI summary
An electrically distributed yaw control system (24; 102; 202, 250; 302; 402; 502; 602) for a helicopter (10; 100; 200, 264; 300; 400; 500; 600) having a tailboom (20; 106; 206, 268; 306; 406; 506; 606) and a power system (58; 522) includes one or more tail rotors (42, 44, 46, 48; 112, 114, 116, 118; 136, 142, 150, 162, 172, 180, 188; 212, 214, 216, 218; 312, 314, 316, 318; 412, 414, 416, 418; 512, 514, 516, 518; 612, 614, 616, 618) including a motor (42b, 44b, 46b, 48b; 612a, 614a, 616a, 618a) rotatably coupled to the tailboom (20; 106; 206, 268; 306; 406; 506; 606) and a power distribution unit (534, 564). The power distribution unit (534, 564) includes a power management monitoring module (72a; 538) configured to monitor one or more flight parameters of the helicopter (10; 100; 200, 264; 300; 400; 500; 600) and a power management command module (72b; 540) configured to allocate power between the power system (58; 522) and the one or more tail rotor motors (42b, 44b, 46b, 48b; 612a, 614a, 616a, 618a) based on the one or more flight parameters of the helicopter (10; 100; 200, 264; 300; 400; 500; 600).