Electric Cutting Tool Contact Detection via Impedance Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety devices for electric cutting tools require conductive clothing or beacons, which are uncomfortable, prone to failure, and can be ineffective due to variations in user impedance, making it difficult to reliably detect contact with the cutting member and prevent injuries.

Innovation Solution

A cutting tool design featuring electrically conductive cutting members, isolated handle and trigger controls, and a dual manual contact electrode system that measures impedance to automatically trigger an emergency stop upon contact, eliminating the need for conductive clothing and improving detection reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conductive clothing or beacons are used for safety detection, then contact detection capability is improved, but device complexity and user inconvenience increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact detection capabilityVSAvoidsafety device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the safety detection function from external accessories (conductive clothing, beacons) and integrates it directly into the tool itself through fixed contact electrodes on the handle and movable contact electrode on the cutting member, eliminating the need for separate safety devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tool performs safety detection autonomously using its own structural components (handle, cutting member, contact electrodes) without requiring external conductive clothing or beacons, making the system self-sufficient for safety monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conductive clothing is used for safety detection, then contact detection is enabled, but ease of operation deteriorates due to wearing discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact detection capabilityVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the requirement for conductive clothing from the safety system, integrating detection functionality directly into the tool structure so users operate the tool without any special clothing or accessories

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring the user to wear conductive clothing to enable detection, the patent inverts the approach by making the tool itself conductive and using its structural components as detection elements, so the tool adapts to the user rather than requiring the user to adapt to the tool

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If conductive clothing is used without proper wearing, then safety detection may fail, but this increases object-affected harmful factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact detection capabilityVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes detection capability as an inherent property of the tool structure before use, with contact electrodes pre-positioned on the handle and cutting member, so detection is automatically active without requiring user action to properly wear or activate safety gear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The tool autonomously performs safety detection using its own structural components, eliminating dependency on user compliance with wearing instructions or proper positioning of external safety devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents serious injuries by reliably detecting contact between the user and the cutting member, reducing the risk of deep cuts and ensuring safe operation without the discomfort or failure associated with conductive clothing or beacons.

Implementation Method 1

a device for measuring an impedance characteristic of the first electrical circuit and the impedance characteristic of the second electrical circuit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical impedance measurement: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentEP3714199B1Electric cutting tool with automatic emergency stop
Publication Date: 2021.10.27 PELLENC SA
  • EP3714199B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3714199B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3714199B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a safety cutting tool (10) comprising - an electrically conductive cutting member (12), - an electric motor (20) for actuating the cutting member (12), a gripping handle (30) for the cutting tool (10) to be gripped in the hand of a user, the gripping handle being electrically insulated from the cutting tool, - a cutting trigger control (28) that can be actuated by the hand of the user gripping the gripping handle, the cutting trigger control being electrically insulated from the cutting tool, - an emergency stop device (40) sensitive to a user coming into contact with the cutting member. According to the invention, the emergency stop device is controlled by a comparator comparing an impedance of a first electric circuit comprising the cutting tool and a second electric circuit used as a reference, the first and second circuits comprising manual contact electrodes provided on at least one of the gripping handle (30) of the tool and the cutting trigger control (28). The invention also concerns a method for controlling such a tool. The invention is applicable to electric secateurs and shears.