Non-oriented electrical steel sheet composition for low core loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-oriented electrical steel sheets face challenges in reducing high-frequency core loss while maintaining productivity, especially when the relative amount of Al exceeds a certain limit, leading to increased hysteresis loss and decreased productivity.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a specific chemical composition with controlled amounts of Si, Al, P, and Mn, along with precise texture control through grain size management and annealing processes, to maintain low high-frequency core loss without compromising productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the amount of Al is increased to decrease core loss, then specific resistance increases and core loss decreases, but hysteresis loss increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore lossVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the amount of Al within 1.00-2.70 mass% and maintaining specific compositional ratios (Al/(Si+Al) between 0.30-0.50, Al/(Si+Al+Mn) between 0.20-0.40). This optimized parameter range increases specific resistance to reduce core loss while avoiding excessive hysteresis loss and maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material principles by combining multiple alloying elements (Si, Al, Mn, P, Ti, V, Nb, Zr) in specific proportions to create a non-oriented electrical steel sheet with balanced properties. The synergistic effect of these elements achieves low core loss while maintaining adequate productivity and mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Loss of energy

If the amount of Si and Al is increased to increase specific resistance, then core loss decreases, but cracks and ruptures appear during manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore lossVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the amounts of Si (0.50-2.70 mass%) and Al (1.00-2.70 mass%) within specific ranges and controlling their ratio. This balanced composition increases specific resistance to reduce core loss while preventing excessive hardness that would cause cracks and ruptures during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the roles of Si and Al: Si primarily increases specific resistance, while Al provides a more balanced effect with less impact on hardness. The controlled ratio ensures local optimization of electrical properties without compromising manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Power

If the rotation rate of drive motor is increased to compensate for decrease in torque, then output is maintained, but frequency of magnetic field increases and core loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveoutputVSAvoidcore loss
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the chemical composition parameters (Si: 0.50-2.70 mass%, Al: 1.00-2.70 mass%, Mn: 0.10-3.00 mass%, P: 0.005-0.100 mass%) to achieve frequency-dependent core loss reduction. The specific compositional ratios ensure low core loss across a wide frequency range, enabling high-speed motor operation with maintained efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces high-frequency core loss and enhances the energy efficiency of electrical machinery, allowing for easier punching and reduced manufacturing costs, while maintaining high productivity and yield.

Implementation Method 1

a specific resistance of 60.0×10−8 Ω·m or higher at room temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

the hysteresis loss increases with magnetostriction which increases as the relative amount of Al increases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic hysteresis: Magnetic Hysteresis

Implementation Method 3

the hysteresis loss increases with magnetostriction which increases as the relative amount of Al increases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetostriction: Magnetostriction

Data Source

PatentUS11396681B2Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and method for manufacturing thereof
Publication Date: 2022.07.26 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US11396681B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-oriented electrical steel sheet includes C: 0 to 0.0050 mass %, Si: 0.50 to 2.70 mass %, Mn: 0.10 to 3.00 mass %, Al: 1.00 to 2.70 mass %, and P: 0.050 to 0.100 mass %. In the non-oriented electrical steel sheet, Al/(Si+Al+0.5×Mn) is 0.50 to 0.83, Si+Al/2+Mn/4+5×P is 1.28 to 3.90, Si+Al+0.5×Mn is 4.0 to 7.0, the ratio of the intensity of {100} plane I{100} to the intensity of {111} plane I{111} is 0.50 to 1.40, the specific resistance is 60.0×10−8 Ω·m or higher at room temperature, and the thickness is 0.05 mm to 0.40 mm.