Electrocatalyst Array Topography for Selective Multi-Electron Redox

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrochemical redox catalytic processes are hindered by the high cost of expensive catalytic materials and the challenge of optimizing catalytic efficiency without considering the electrode surface topography, which affects reaction rates and energy requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an electrocatalyst array with surface structures protruding from a support substrate, where the functional surface contacts active species in a conductive solution, focusing charge density at the surface structures to enhance redox reactions, allowing for the use of lower-cost catalysts and improving reaction efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If expensive catalytic materials are used, then catalytic activity is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the electrocatalyst material at specific locations on the electrode surface structures, particularly at the tips and edges where charge density is focused. This localized catalyst placement maximizes catalytic activity at the most reactive sites while minimizing the total amount of expensive catalyst material required, thereby resolving the contradiction between catalytic activity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining electrocatalyst materials with electrode substrate materials to create a hybrid structure. The electrode array consists of conductive substrate structures coated or decorated with catalytic materials, creating a composite system that leverages the electrical conductivity of the substrate and the catalytic activity of the catalyst layer, achieving cost-effective catalysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If reaction rate is improved, then productivity increases, but energy requirement increases due to larger driving force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenergy requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the physical and chemical parameters of the electrode surface, including creating three-dimensional surface structures with specific geometries, optimizing catalyst composition and loading, and adjusting surface area-to-volume ratios. These parameter optimizations enable the system to achieve high reaction rates at lower overpotentials, improving productivity while reducing energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes dimensionality change by transitioning from flat two-dimensional electrode surfaces to three-dimensional surface structures such as arrays of protruding elements. This three-dimensional architecture increases the effective surface area and creates multiple active sites, enhancing reaction rates without proportionally increasing the driving force required, thus improving productivity while managing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If electrode surface topography is optimized, then catalytic efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic efficiencyVSAvoidsurface structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the electrode surface into multiple discrete three-dimensional structures or protrusions rather than using a continuous flat surface. Each structure can be independently optimized for catalytic function, and the segmented architecture facilitates better mass transport and charge distribution. This segmentation approach improves catalytic efficiency while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the rate of catalysis, reduces energy requirements, and changes reaction mechanisms, such as shifting from two-electron to four-electron oxygen reduction processes, leading to more efficient and cost-effective redox reactions.

Implementation Method 1

catalysing an electrochemical redox reaction of an active species in a conductive solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical redox reaction: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

the charge density (voltage or current) is focussed at the functional surfaces and the active species undergoes the redox reaction following contact with the functional surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical catalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20250003087A1Apparatus and method of catalysis
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS LIMITED
  • US20250003087A1 patent drawing
  • US20250003087A1 patent drawing
  • US20250003087A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to a method of selection of an electrocatalyst array for a desired product outcome. The method comprises exposing an electrocatalyst system to an active agent dissolved or suspended in a conductive solution; and applying a voltage to the electrocatalyst system. The voltage sufficient to cause a multi-electron oxidation or multi-electron reduction of the active species; the electrocatalyst system comprises a counter electrode; and an electrocatalyst array. The array comprising a support substrate; uniformly sized surface structures protruding from a surface of the support substrate; the uniformly sized surface structures have edges and/or apices comprising a catalyst. When the uniformly sized surface structures are of a micrometer scale a first product ratio is produced, when the uniformly sized surface structures are of a nanometer scale a second product ratio is produced, wherein the first and second product ratios are different; the second product ratio requires a higher order electron process compared to producing the first product ratio.