Electrochemical Deposition for Uranium Extraction from Seawater

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for extracting uranium from seawater face challenges due to low ion concentrations and high salinity, leading to slow diffusion, Coulomb repulsion, and competition from other cations, resulting in limited capacity and kinetics in physicochemical adsorption processes.

Innovation Solution

The use of functionalized carbon-based electrodes with amidoxime-based chemicals in an electrochemical cell, applying alternating current to facilitate electrochemical deposition of uranium ions, avoiding Coulomb repulsion and blocking by other cations, and enabling higher capacity and faster kinetics through electrodeposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If physicochemical adsorption is used to extract uranium from seawater, then the method is simple to implement, but the extraction capacity is limited due to surface site blocking and slow diffusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidextraction capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the extraction mechanism from physicochemical adsorption to electrochemical deposition by applying electrical potential. This parameter change transforms the limiting factor from surface area to volumetric capacity, enabling significantly higher uranium extraction capacity while maintaining ease of implementation through controlled electrochemical processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the passive physicochemical adsorption mechanism with an active electrochemical deposition mechanism. By substituting the mechanical/diffusion-based adsorption process with an electrically-driven deposition process, the system overcomes surface site blocking and achieves higher extraction capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional adsorption sorbents are used, then the initial cost is lower, but the kinetics of uranium extraction is slow due to diffusion limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial costVSAvoidextraction kinetics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces diffusion-limited adsorption kinetics with electrochemically-driven deposition kinetics. The applied electrical potential creates a driving force that accelerates uranium ion transport and deposition, significantly improving extraction kinetics while maintaining cost-effectiveness through the use of standard electrochemical equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the kinetic regime from diffusion-controlled to electrochemically-controlled by applying electrical potential. This parameter change transforms the rate-determining step from slow diffusion to faster electrochemical reactions, achieving high productivity while keeping operational costs manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If adsorption-based methods are used to extract uranium at low concentrations, then the process is straightforward, but selectivity is poor due to competition from other cations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces non-selective physicochemical adsorption with selective electrochemical deposition. By controlling the electrical potential, the system can selectively deposit uranium ions at specific potentials while leaving other cations in solution, dramatically improving selectivity while maintaining process simplicity through potential control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the selection mechanism from affinity-based adsorption to potential-based deposition. By adjusting the electrical potential parameter, the system achieves high selectivity for uranium over competing cations, as each metal ion has a characteristic deposition potential that can be exploited for selective extraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If sorbent surface area is increased to improve capacity, then more uranium sites are available, but Coulomb repulsion blocks incoming uranium ions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction capacityVSAvoidCoulomb repulsion
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces adsorption-based capacity accumulation with deposition-based capacity accumulation. Instead of relying on surface area, the electrochemical deposition process allows uranium to be deposited throughout the electrode volume, eliminating Coulomb repulsion effects and enabling much higher capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the capacity-determining parameter from surface area to deposited mass. By transforming the extraction mechanism from surface adsorption to volumetric deposition, the system eliminates the Coulomb repulsion limitation and achieves capacity proportional to the amount of uranium deposited rather than the electrode surface area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves a 9-fold higher uranium extraction capacity and 4-fold faster kinetics compared to traditional physicochemical methods, with high selectivity and efficient desorption, maintaining high extraction efficiency even at low concentrations and preventing saturation.

Implementation Method 1

applying a voltage or an electrical current to an electrolytic cell across the cathode and the anode and is sufficient to reduce the metal ions to form an elemental metal species at the cathode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reduction: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

oxidize the sacrificial reductant at the anode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical oxidation: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 3

at least one of the electrically conductive electrodes is a functionalized electrode having species-specific adsorption of the target ion species

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpecies-specific adsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentEP3478862B1Electrochemical deposition for metal ion extraction/removal from water
Publication Date: 2021.06.09 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • EP3478862B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1D
  • EP3478862B1 patent drawingFigure 1C
  • EP3478862B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2D

AI summary

A method for extracting metal ions from water is provided that includes disposing two electrically conductive electrodes in water, where the water includes a target ion species in solution, where at least one of the electrically conductive electrodes is a functionalized electrode having species-specific adsorption of the target ion species, and providing electrical current to the electrically conductive electrodes such that the one or more target ion species are deposited to metallic form or metal oxides at the functionalized electrode by one or more electrochemical reactions.