Electrochemical Electrode for Metal Corner Chamfering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manual methods for corner breaking on metal parts, such as those in aeronautics, are time-consuming, prone to defects, and lack repeatability, with inadequate control over the angle breakage process, leading to potential injuries and collateral damage.

Innovation Solution

An electrode with a conductive zone shaped complementary to the angle break, positioned between insulating parts for precise electrochemical machining, supported by a gantry for automated positioning and non-destructive testing, ensuring consistent and efficient corner breaking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual angle breaking operations are performed by milling, grinding, or brushing, then the edges can be machined to remove burrs, but the operations are time-consuming and prone to defects such as scratches and localized overheating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of angle breakingVSAvoidtime required for angle breaking
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical angle breaking operations (milling, grinding, brushing) with electrochemical machining. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact between tools and the workpiece, thereby preventing mechanical defects such as scratches and localized overheating while significantly reducing operation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of the machining process from mechanical force to electrochemical reaction. By controlling electrical parameters (current density, electrolyte composition, voltage) rather than mechanical parameters (tool speed, feed rate, pressure), the process achieves both high precision and high productivity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual angle breaking is performed by different operators, then various edges can be machined, but good repeatability of the machining cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to machine various edgesVSAvoidrepeatability of machining
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode is designed with a shape complementary to the desired angle break profile. This self-forming capability allows the electrode geometry itself to define the machining outcome, eliminating variability introduced by different operators while maintaining the ability to machine various edge configurations by simply changing the electrode shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The electrode is pre-shaped with the complementary geometry of the desired angle break before the machining operation. This preliminary preparation of the tool geometry ensures that the same precise profile is reproduced on every workpiece, guaranteeing repeatability across different operations and operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If hardenable paste is applied to control angle breakage, then the profile can be inspected by lighting and magnification, but the control process is time-consuming and unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of angle breakage controlVSAvoidtime required for control and inspection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual inspection method using hardenable paste, lighting, and magnification with electrochemical machining that inherently produces precise and controllable angle breaks. The electrochemical process provides built-in precision through controlled material removal, eliminating the need for separate inspection steps and reducing overall time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If manual machining is used to break angles, then edges can be processed, but collateral damage such as tool blows and localized overheating occurs on the part

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to perform angle breakingVSAvoidcollateral damage to part
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces mechanical machining tools with an electrochemical machining system. This substitution eliminates direct mechanical contact between tools and the workpiece, thereby preventing tool blows, impact damage, and localized overheating that are inherent in mechanical machining processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables rapid, defect-free, and reproducible corner breaking with reduced risk of collateral damage, allowing for precise control and significant time savings in the machining and inspection process.

Implementation Method 1

an electrode for corner breaking of a metal part by electrochemical machining

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical machining: Electrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP2611562B1Electrode and facility for chamfering the corners of a metal workpiece
Publication Date: 2020.10.28 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • EP2611562B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2611562B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

The invention relates to an electrode for chamfering the corners of a workpiece by electrochemical machining, comprising at least one conductive region (62, 68) to be arranged facing a workpiece corner to be chamfered. Said electrode is characterized in that the conducting region (62, 68) has a shape complementary to that of the chamfered corner to be produced, and is arranged between a first part forming an insulating excessive thickness, and an insulating second part for positioning the conducting region such that it faces the corner to be chamfered.