Electrode Disconnect Detection with Pearson Noise-Spectrum Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Neuromonitoring systems face challenges in detecting and correcting electrode disconnections during surgical procedures, which can lead to incorrect signal detection and potential nerve damage due to the difficulty in identifying detached electrodes, especially when monitoring is performed remotely.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a Pearson correlation coefficient to compare the power spectral density of electrode signals with known noise, alerting users to disconnections and implementing remediation measures, such as disregarding or reattaching electrodes, to ensure accurate neuromonitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electrodes are adhered to the patient's skin for neuromonitoring, then nerve responses can be monitored during surgery, but electrodes can be accidentally removed or fall off resulting in incorrect signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode connection reliabilityVSAvoidnerve response signal accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors electrode signals and provides feedback about electrode connection status. By analyzing signal characteristics and comparing them against expected patterns, the system detects when electrodes become disconnected and alerts the surgical team, ensuring continuous reliable monitoring throughout the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection of electrode connections with an automated electronic detection system. The neuromonitoring system automatically analyzes electrical signals to determine electrode status, substituting mechanical observation with electronic signal processing and automated diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If the surgical team manually monitors electrode connections, then disconnections can be detected, but the individual performing neuromonitoring may be some distance away from the patient affecting their ability to readily see electrode status

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode connection status detectionVSAvoidremote monitoring accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary automated detection mechanism between the distant monitor and the patient's electrodes. Instead of requiring direct visual access to electrode connections, the system uses electrical signal analysis as an intermediary method to convey connection status information to the remote surgical team.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical requirement of visual inspection with electronic signal processing. The system automatically detects electrode status through electrical characteristics, eliminating the need for the monitor to be physically close to the patient or to manually inspect connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If many recording sites are monitored, then comprehensive nerve coverage is achieved, but the identification of incorrect signals in a timely manner becomes difficult during surgery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive nerve monitoring coverageVSAvoidsignal monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the monitoring task by analyzing signals from each recording site independently through automated algorithms. Each electrode channel is evaluated separately for connection status and signal quality, allowing comprehensive monitoring of multiple sites while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic individual assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system performs self-service by automatically detecting and identifying incorrect signals without requiring manual intervention. The automated analysis continuously evaluates all recording sites, identifying disconnections or abnormal signals independently, which simplifies the overall system operation despite the large number of monitored channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of time

If detached electrodes are not detected, then the surgical team may take unnecessary steps to save the nerve, but detecting disconnections requires continuous monitoring and analysis of electrode signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical time wasted on unnecessary interventionsVSAvoidcomputing resources for signal processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces energy-intensive continuous visual monitoring with efficient automated electronic signal processing. By using computational algorithms to analyze electrical characteristics, the system detects disconnections with minimal energy consumption while preventing unnecessary surgical interventions through accurate real-time detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250248665A1Electrode disconnect detection
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 NUVASIVE INC
  • US20250248665A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248665A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248665A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed examples include those directed to detecting and remediating detachment of electrodes from a patient. In an example, a system calculates a Pearson correlation coefficient between: (1) power spectral density of the noise and (2) power spectral density of a recorded signal (e.g., from an electrode being operated in free-run EMG mode). If the recorded signal correlates with the noise, then the system notifies the user of presence of noise (e.g., the fallen electrode). Otherwise, the recorded signal is considered as the signal of interest (e.g., a valid EMG signal).