Electrode With Electrolyte Suction For Precision Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electrochemical machining faces challenges in controlling electrolyte flow and achieving precise surface quality, particularly in forming cavities where side surfaces often have inferior quality compared to the bottom surface, leading to potential disturbances and the need for subsequent machining.

Innovation Solution

An electrode with an active surface that systematically controls electrolyte flow by suctioning off the electrolyte from the active area, preventing accidental activation of adjacent surfaces and allowing localized activation, which reduces material removal in non-active areas and eliminates the need for an immersion bath.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the electrode is used as an immersion electrode in an electrolyte bath, then the workpiece can be machined, but the electrolyte flow cannot be controlled and spent electrolyte cannot drain away easily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte flow controlVSAvoidspent electrolyte drainage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode is designed with a pulsed motion in the advancing direction, dynamically opening or enlarging the machining gap between the electrode and workpiece. This dynamic motion allows the narrow machining gap to be periodically opened, enabling spent electrolyte to drain away more easily while maintaining effective machining during the non-pulsed phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If the electrode surfaces adjacent to the active surface remain wet with electrolyte, then material removal occurs in side gap areas, but this causes inferior surface quality on side surfaces and requires subsequent machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside surface qualityVSAvoidnumber of machining steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode is provided with electric insulation on specific surface areas where no material removal is intended. This local differentiation of electrode surface properties ensures that only the desired active surface areas remain wet and active, while insulated areas prevent accidental activation and material removal in side gap regions, thereby achieving high side surface quality in a single machining step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If electrodes with retractable partial electrodes are used to control electrolyte flow, then localized activation is achieved, but the mechanical implementation becomes very complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte flow controlVSAvoidelectrode structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using complex mechanical retractable partial electrodes to control electrolyte flow, the invention replaces the mechanical system with electric insulation applied directly to electrode surface areas. This substitution achieves the same localized activation control without the mechanical complexity of retractable mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If the cavity is machined in two stages with different electrodes, then the bottom surface and side surfaces can be machined separately, but this requires a double set of electrodes and causes etching in the bottom surface area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidnumber of electrodes
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single electrode is provided with electric insulation on specific surface areas to differentiate between active and inactive zones. This allows the same electrode to machine both bottom and side surfaces with appropriate surface quality without requiring a double set of electrodes, and prevents etching in the bottom surface area during side surface machining by keeping those areas insulated and dry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables precise machining of both bottom and side surfaces without subsequent machining, reduces resource requirements, and prevents caustic attacks by ensuring only the active area is energized and electrolyte is used efficiently, resulting in improved surface quality and reduced equipment needs.

Implementation Method 1

Electrochemical machining (ECM) and pulsed electrochemical machining (PECM) make it possible to machine workpiece surfaces very precisely and without stress to the material. In this process, a potential differential is built up between a workpiece that serves as the anode and an electrode that serves as the cathode or tool and that is positioned across from the workpiece area that is to be machined, after which material is removed from the workpiece via an electrolyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical machining: Electrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS9764403B2Method and electrode for electrochemically processing a workpiece
Publication Date: 2017.09.19 MTU AERO ENGINES GMBH
  • US9764403B2 patent drawing
  • US9764403B2 patent drawing
  • US9764403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for electrochemically processing a workpiece surface using an electrode, which has at least one effective surface for processing the workpiece surface, and using an electrolyte, wherein the electrolyte is suctioned away from the effective surface. The invention further relates to an electrode, which has at least one electrolyte feed for supplying the electrolyte to the effective area and an electrolyte suctioning system for suctioning the electrolyte away from the effective area.