3D Electrode Modeling for Battery Performance Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for modeling electrode structures in secondary batteries lack the ability to accurately represent the characteristics of actual electrodes, necessitating improved methods for setting a representative elementary volume (REV) to enhance the reliability of electrode performance analysis.

Innovation Solution

An electrode performance analysis apparatus and method that systematically sets an REV by 3D modeling an initial electrode structure, determining a reference lattice cell based on specific parameters, and verifying the reliability of the modeled structure to analyze performance metrics such as electrical conductivity, ionic conductivity, and active material reaction area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional electrode structure modeling methods are used, then the modeling process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of representing actual electrode characteristics is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode structure is segmented into multiple lattice cells arranged in a grid pattern, where each lattice cell represents a discrete volumetric element. This segmentation allows the complex electrode structure to be broken down into manageable units that can be individually characterized and then assembled into a comprehensive 3D model, improving modeling accuracy while maintaining systematic complexity management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different lattice cells are assigned different local properties including active material particle size, filling rate, and porosity values that reflect the actual spatial variation within the electrode. This local quality approach enables the model to capture heterogeneity in electrode characteristics at different locations, significantly improving the representation of actual electrode behavior compared to uniform modeling approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 3:

The modeling approach transitions from traditional 2D or simplified representations to a full 3D lattice cell structure. By adding the third dimension and creating a volumetric grid of lattice cells, the model can accurately represent the spatial distribution and three-dimensional morphology of active material particles and pores within the electrode, greatly enhancing modeling fidelity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a representative elementary volume (REV) is systematically determined through parameter analysis, then the reliability of performance analysis is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance analysis reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements an iterative feedback mechanism where performance metrics are calculated for different candidate REV volumes, and the results are used to refine the REV selection. The analyzing unit evaluates multiple lattice cell configurations and uses the performance analysis feedback to identify the optimal REV that best represents the electrode characteristics, ensuring reliable performance prediction while systematically managing the complexity through structured iteration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The method systematically varies key parameters including the volume of lattice cells, active material particle size distribution, filling rate, and porosity to determine the representative elementary volume. By changing these parameters in a controlled manner and analyzing their impact on performance metrics, the system identifies the REV that provides the most reliable representation of electrode behavior, transforming a complex selection problem into a systematic parameter optimization process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4651261A1Electrode performance analysis apparatus and operation method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
  • EP4651261A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4651261A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4651261A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An electrode performance analysis apparatus according to an embodiment disclosed herein includes a first modeling unit configured to three-dimensionally (3D) model an initial electrode structure, an obtaining unit configured to obtain a first parameter comprising at least one of an active material particle size, a filling rate, or a filling rate from each of a plurality of lattice cells in the initial electrode structure, a second modeling unit configured to 3D model a reference electrode structure based on the first parameter, and an analyzing unit configured to analyze performance of the reference electrode structure.