Electrode Sling for Stress Urge Incontinence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for stress and urge incontinence, such as pubovaginal sling procedures and implantable devices, often require invasive methods and may not effectively address the underlying muscle support issues, leading to inconsistent continence results and potential complications.

Innovation Solution

An implantable mechanical support, such as a sling, coupled with electrodes that apply electrical currents to stimulate pelvic muscles, inducing contraction or relaxation to enhance urethral support and prevent incontinence, is used to treat stress and urge incontinence through subthreshold stimulation and action potential propagation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If invasive surgical methods are used for incontinence treatment, then continence results may be improved, but patient trauma and recovery time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinence resultsVSAvoidpatient trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical surgical interventions with electrical stimulation therapy. Electrical pulses are delivered through electrodes to stimulate the pelvic floor muscles and sphincter, providing continence control without invasive mechanical surgery. This substitution reduces patient trauma while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electrical stimulation device as an intermediary between the patient's nervous system and pelvic floor muscles. The device delivers controlled electrical impulses that mediate muscle contraction and relaxation, providing continence control without direct mechanical intervention on the pelvic structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If traditional sling procedures are used, then urethral support may be improved, but underlying muscle support issues are not effectively addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurethral supportVSAvoidcontinence results
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces passive mechanical sling support with active electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor muscles. Instead of relying solely on external mechanical support structures, the system activates the patient's own muscle tissue through electrical impulses, addressing the root cause of support deficiency rather than providing external reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the patient's pelvic floor muscles to serve their own support function through electrical stimulation. The system activates the patient's intrinsic muscle tissue to provide urethral support, rather than requiring external mechanical structures. This self-service approach addresses underlying muscle weakness by activating the muscles' natural support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Strength

If electrical stimulation is applied to pelvic muscles, then muscle contraction and urethral support are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuscle contractionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the electrical stimulation device to perform multiple functions: stimulating pelvic floor muscles, supporting the urethra, treating both stress and urge incontinence, and providing adjustable therapy levels. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate devices into a single integrated system, managing complexity through functional consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the electrical stimulation electrodes, control circuitry, and therapeutic functions into a single integrated device. The system merges diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, as well as multiple stimulation modes, into one unified apparatus, reducing the number of separate components and simplifying the overall treatment system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides effective support for the urethra, reducing incontinence episodes by stimulating pelvic muscles and nerves, offering a minimally invasive approach with adjustable tension and potential for long-term relief from incontinence symptoms.

Implementation Method 1

One or more electrodes are coupled to the mechanical support, so as to contact tissue of the patient. A control unit drives the electrodes to apply a current to the tissue.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

the applied current is typically configured to treat urge incontinence by stimulating a pelvic muscle of the patient and inducing contraction of the muscle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAction potential propagation:

Data Source

PatentUS9889298B2Electrode sling for treating stress and urge incontinence
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 ENDO OPERATIONS LTD
  • US9889298B2 patent drawing
  • US9889298B2 patent drawing
  • US9889298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus is provided, including an implantable mechanical support comprising a mesh shaped to support a portion of a urethra of a patient. One or more electrodes, coupled to the mesh, so as to contact tissue of the patient when the mechanical support (26) is implanted in the patient. A control unit drives the electrodes to apply a current to the tissue. Other embodiments are also described.