Electrohydraulic Robot Joint Drive With Variable Pump Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing articulated robots face challenges in achieving desired movement at joints due to varying torque and speed requirements, which are not adequately met by traditional electric motor-driven systems, leading to insufficient performance depending on the posture of the manipulator.

Innovation Solution

An electrohydraulic robot system with a manipulator and drive devices, each comprising a hydraulic actuator, a variable capacity hydraulic pump, and an electric motor, where the control device adjusts the discharge capacity of the pump to control torque and speed, allowing for focused drive-force or speed movements at each joint.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the speed reduction ratio of the speed reducer is set high, then the torque for joint movement is increased, but the speed for joint movement is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque for joint movementVSAvoidspeed for joint movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the speed reduction ratio variable rather than fixed. The control device dynamically adjusts the speed reduction ratio of the hydraulic speed reducer based on real-time requirements for torque and speed at each joint, allowing the system to adapt between torque-focused and speed-focused operation modes as needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of speed reduction ratio from a constant value to a variable parameter. By controlling the discharge capacity of the hydraulic pump, the system varies the speed reduction ratio to match the varying torque and speed requirements at different joint positions and operational phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the speed reduction ratio of the speed reducer is set low, then the speed for joint movement is increased, but the torque for joint movement is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed for joint movementVSAvoidtorque for joint movement
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the speed reduction ratio based on real-time torque and speed requirements. When high speed is needed, the control device lowers the speed reduction ratio, and when high torque is needed, it increases the speed reduction ratio, allowing optimal performance in both regimes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The speed reduction ratio is changed from a fixed parameter to a variable parameter controlled by the discharge capacity of the hydraulic pump, enabling the system to provide sufficient torque at low speed reduction ratios and high speed at high reduction ratios as conditions require

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If the size of the electric motor is increased to meet varying torque and speed demands, then the torque and speed requirements are satisfied, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque and speed capabilityVSAvoidmotor size and system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the direct electric motor-drive system with a hydraulic transmission system. The electric motor drives a hydraulic pump that supplies pressurized fluid to hydraulic actuators, which then drive the joints. This hydraulic intermediary enables flexible torque and speed control without requiring a large, complex electric motor with variable capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The hydraulic system acts as an intermediary between the electric motor and the joints. The hydraulic pump and hydraulic actuators serve as intermediate components that transform the motor's rotational output into the required torque and speed at each joint, simplifying the overall system while maintaining full control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables desired movement at each joint by adjusting the hydraulic pump's discharge capacity, reducing the need for large electric motors and improving work efficiency by matching torque and speed requirements dynamically.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic pump of a variable capacity type that supplies a working fluid to the hydraulic actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

a hydraulic actuator that moves a corresponding one of the plurality of joints

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS20240238965A1Electrohydraulic robot
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KK
  • US20240238965A1 patent drawing
  • US20240238965A1 patent drawing
  • US20240238965A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This electrohydraulic robot includes: a manipulator including a plurality of joints; a plurality of drive devices that are provided in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of joints and each move a corresponding one of the plurality of joints; and a control device that controls movement of each of the plurality of drive devices. Each of the plurality of drive devices includes: a hydraulic actuator that moves a corresponding one of the plurality of joints; a hydraulic pump that supplies a working fluid to the hydraulic actuator; and an electric motor that drives the hydraulic pump. The control device is a pump of a variable capacity type that drives the electric motor and changes the discharge capacity of the hydraulic pump.