Electrolysis Cell Support Members with Dual Spring Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrolysis cells with resilient support elements fail to adequately compensate for dimensional tolerances during assembly, leading to incomplete deflection and uneven contact between electrodes and separators, which can result in damage or inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

The electrolysis cell employs support members with dual spring means, where a first spring means ensures proper contact and a second spring means with higher stiffness compensates for tolerances by plastic deformation, preventing excessive loads and maintaining uniform contact pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single spring means is used to support the electrode, then the structure is simple, but it cannot adequately compensate for assembly tolerances while ensuring smooth contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport structureVSAvoidcontact uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into two distinct spring means: a first spring means (resilient member) that provides continuous resilient support for smooth electrode contact, and a second spring means (adjustable support element) that compensates for assembly tolerances. This segmentation allows each spring means to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the stiffness parameter by using two spring means with different stiffness characteristics. The first spring means has lower stiffness for smooth contact, while the second spring means has higher stiffness for tolerance compensation. This parameter differentiation resolves the contradiction by assigning appropriate stiffness values to different functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the spring deflection is designed for smooth contact surface, then contact quality is improved, but the spring may be fully deflected before accommodating assembly tolerances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact surface smoothnessVSAvoidtolerance compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into two distinct spring means: a first spring means (resilient member) that provides continuous resilient support for smooth electrode contact, and a second spring means (adjustable support element) that compensates for assembly tolerances. This segmentation allows each spring means to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second spring means is designed to provide excessive support capacity beyond what is needed for smooth contact alone. It can deflect fully when assembly tolerances require maximum adjustment, while the first spring means maintains continuous contact. This partial/excessive action ensures that tolerance compensation needs are fully met without compromising contact quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If higher stiffness spring is used for tolerance compensation, then adaptability is improved, but contact smoothness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance compensationVSAvoidcontact surface smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into two distinct spring means: a first spring means (resilient member) that provides continuous resilient support for smooth electrode contact, and a second spring means (adjustable support element) that compensates for assembly tolerances. This segmentation allows each spring means to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the stiffness parameter by using two spring means with different stiffness characteristics. The first spring means has lower stiffness for smooth contact, while the second spring means has higher stiffness for tolerance compensation. This parameter differentiation resolves the contradiction by assigning appropriate stiffness values to different functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual spring system effectively adjusts to assembly tolerances, ensuring smooth electrode contact and preventing damage to separators while optimizing cell efficiency and performance.

Implementation Method 1

one or more first spring means provided in the body portion or the support portions for providing a resilient force with respect to the supported electrode when deflected by a load applied from said electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

one or more second spring means each having a higher stiffness than that of the first spring means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasticity: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4600406A1Electrolysis cell with support members having first and second spring means
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 THYSSENKRUPP UHDE CHLORINE ENGINEERS GMBH
  • EP4600406A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4600406A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4600406A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4B

AI summary

The present application relates to a electrolysis cell for chlor-alkali or alkaline water electrolysis comprising: two cell elements each defining an electrode chamber by providing a back wall and sidewalls of the electrode chambers; an electrode accommodated in each of the electrode chambers; a sheet-like separator extending in a height direction and a width direction of the electrolysis cell, the separator being interposed in a joint between the two cell elements and providing a separating wall between the electrode chambers; and a plurality of support members (13A) supporting at least one of the electrodes on the respective back wall. The support members (13A) each comprise: two support portions (14, 15) standing upright on the back wall and extending in the height direction of the electrolysis cell; a body portion (18) connecting the two support portions (14, 15) in the width direction; and one or more first spring means provided in the body portion (18) or the support portions (14, 15) for providing a resilient force with respect to the supported electrode when deflected by a load applied from said electrode. Each support member (13A) further comprises one or more second spring means (32, 33) each having a higher stiffness than that of the first spring means.