Electrolytic Deburring of Sealed Metal Laminate Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional deburring processes for metal laminate structures in electrical generators often damage the mill coating layers, leading to insulation failures and the need for recoating, which is inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A sealed metal laminate structure is created with enamel layers on the mill coating layers, except at exposed metal protrusions, and a phosphate sealer is deposited on these protrusions to prevent damage and maintain insulation, using a system with electrolyte baths of opposite polarity to remove burrs without sanding or grinding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional deburring processes (sanding and grinding) are used to remove burrs, then burr removal is achieved, but the mill coating layers are damaged or removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburr removal qualityVSAvoiddamage to mill coating layers
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical deburring processes (sanding and grinding) with an electrolytic deburring process. The electrolytic system uses electrical current and electrolyte solution to chemically remove burrs through electrochemical reactions, eliminating the mechanical contact that causes coating damage while achieving effective burr removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the deburring process from mechanical force to electrochemical reaction. By controlling electrical parameters (current density, voltage, electrolyte composition), the process selectively removes metal at burr locations without mechanically contacting or damaging the mill coating layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If conventional deburring processes are used, then burrs are removed, but recoating is required due to coating damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidrecoating time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By substituting mechanical deburring with electrolytic deburring, the process eliminates coating damage that would necessitate recoating operations. This integration of burr removal and coating preservation into a single process step eliminates the separate recoating工序, thereby reducing total manufacturing time and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If the metal sheet and mill coating are especially thin, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the risk of damage from deburring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelamination thickness controlVSAvoidcoating integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electrolytic deburring process replaces mechanical contact with electrochemical action, allowing precise control of material removal through electrical parameters. This enables safe processing of thin laminations with delicate mill coatings, as the electrochemical reaction can be tuned to remove only burrs without affecting the thin coating layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution prevents damage to mill coating layers, maintains uniform thickness, reduces burr formation, and eliminates the need for recoating, enhancing the quality and efficiency of the manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

using a system with electrolyte baths of opposite polarity to remove burrs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

a phosphate sealer is deposited on these protrusions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodeposition: Electrodeposition

Data Source

PatentUS10407796B2Metal laminate structures with systems and methods for treating
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US10407796B2 patent drawing
  • US10407796B2 patent drawing
  • US10407796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to a sealed metal laminate structure comprising: a metal layer having a first surface and an opposite second surface; a first enamel layer laminated on the first surface of the metal layer, except at an exposed metal protrusion at a perimeter edge of the sealed metal laminate structure; a second enamel layer laminated on the second surface of the metal layer, except at the exposed metal protrusion at the perimeter edge of the sealed laminate structure; and a phosphate sealer deposited on the exposed metal protrusion of the sealed metal laminate structure. The present disclosure also relates to a metal laminate structure without a phosphate sealer. In addition, systems and methods for treating workpieces, including metal laminate structures, are discussed.