Electrolytic Descaling Unit with Segmented Electrodes and Sludge Hoppers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional metal strips processing lines face inefficiencies due to slag accumulation, energy wastage, and maintenance challenges in high-efficiency electrolytic descaling and pickling processes, particularly with direct current configurations, which hinder the full exploitation of advanced processes and lead to increased environmental impact and costs.

Innovation Solution

A surface preparation unit with a modular tank design and discontinuous electrode armatures, combined with efficient electrolyte recirculation and agitation systems, optimizes the electric field homogeneity, reduces energy consumption, and facilitates effective sludge and gas evacuation, suitable for direct, alternating, or combined current processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-efficiency electrolytic descaling and pickling processes are implemented, then productivity and tonnage of material treated per time unit increase, but slag accumulation worsens and deposits at tank bottom

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetonnage of material treated per time unitVSAvoidslag accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the harmful slag accumulation problem by introducing a dedicated sludge removal system that actively removes deposited sludge from the tank bottom, separating the sludge removal function from the main electrolytic treatment process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses hydraulic principles by introducing a fluid stream at an angle to the tank bottom to resuspend and remove deposited sludge, converting the static accumulation problem into a dynamic removal process through fluid flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Power

If contiguous electrodes are arranged at double mutual potential difference, then energy supply increases, but dispersed currents increase and energy is wasted through Joule effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy supplyVSAvoidenergy wasted through Joule effect
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies alternating current instead of direct current, causing periodic reversal of electrode polarities. This periodic action prevents continuous dispersed current flow between contiguous electrodes, as the current direction alternates and prevents sustained Joule heating losses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the electrical parameter from direct current to alternating current, fundamentally altering the current flow characteristics and eliminating the persistent dispersed current problem that causes energy waste through the Joule effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If distance between armature and strip is increased to avoid short-circuits, then reliability improves, but energy consumption and tank dimensions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshort-circuit avoidanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces dynamic movement of the strip through the electrolyte bath, creating hydrodynamic conditions that prevent slag accumulation and adhesion. This dynamic approach allows maintaining smaller gaps without increasing short-circuit risk, as the movement prevents material buildup that would otherwise require larger safety margins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional tank configuration with horizontal armatures is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but gas accumulation and sludge deposition worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetank configuration simplicityVSAvoidgas accumulation and sludge deposition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the continuous horizontal armature into discrete, spaced-apart electrode elements. This segmentation creates gaps that facilitate gas escape and prevent sludge accumulation, while maintaining the basic horizontal electrode configuration for ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a vertical component to the electrode arrangement by spacing electrodes at different heights and positions, creating three-dimensional flow paths that enhance gas and sludge removal while maintaining horizontal treatment effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances process efficiency, reduces energy consumption, and simplifies maintenance by maintaining optimal electric field homogeneity, improving sludge and gas management, and achieving effective cleaning with lower electrical energy usage across various current configurations.

Implementation Method 1

the strip, generally kept at a neutral potential, often 'earthed', is submerged in a conductive solution (acid or neutral) and it passes through electrodes also submerged in the electrolyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

The strip, in these conditions, locally behaves like an armature having a sign opposite to that of the grids towards which it faces progressively. Such polarisation produces, on the metal surface beneath the scale itself, the 'displacement' in the polarisation curve moving the surface of the strip to conditions of anodic dissolution or cathodic protection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 3

slag, at amounts not particularly high, could be kept in suspension by agitating the bath and filtered alongside the electrolyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAgitation: Stirring

Implementation Method 4

slag, at amounts not particularly high, could be kept in suspension by agitating the bath and filtered alongside the electrolyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 5

efficient electrolyte recirculation and agitation systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid recirculation: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2483459B1Surface preparation unit for metal strips processing lines
Publication Date: 2017.06.14 TENOVA
  • EP2483459B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2483459B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A surface preparation unit for metal strips processing lines comprises a tank (12), suitable to contain an electrolyte solution, a system for the suspension/submersion of a strip (11) to be treated, which is continuously fed into the tank (12) in longitudinal direction (F), a plurality of electrode cells (20) comprising upper and lower electrodes (21) respectively made up of upper and lower armatures (22) facing the two larger surfaces of the strip (11) and spaced therefrom respectively by a distance called "upper gap" and "lower gap", such electrodes (21) being connected to an electrical power supply system (34), wherein the tank (12) is shaped at the bottom to form successive hoppers (26), wherein at each of the electrode cells (20) there is provided a hopper (26) which ends with devices (27) for evacuating the waste material in form of undissolved scale, which deposits at the bottom in form of sludge.