Electromagnetic Nucleic Acid Amplification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional PCR techniques require heating elements and temperature controls, leading to DNA loss, potential errors, and high operating and maintenance costs, with reaction times exceeding two hours.

Innovation Solution

The use of a mini-current electromagnetic field to amplify nucleic acids, eliminating the need for heating and reducing reaction times to less than one hour, while using lower amounts of reagents and achieving higher DNA amplification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional PCR heating elements and temperature controls are used, then DNA amplification can be achieved, but DNA loss and damage occur, and operating and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDNA integrityVSAvoidheating damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional thermal heating system with an electromagnetic field system. Specifically, it uses a mini-current electromagnetic field to induce current in the DNA solution, generating heat directly within the sample through resistive heating rather than external heating elements. This substitution eliminates the harmful thermal gradients and direct contact heating that cause DNA damage, while maintaining the necessary temperature control for PCR amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electromagnetic field as an intermediary between the power source and the DNA sample. The electromagnetic field acts as a mediator that transfers energy to the DNA solution without requiring direct thermal contact with heating elements. This intermediary approach allows for controlled, uniform heating that minimizes DNA damage while achieving the required amplification temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional PCR heating processes are used, then DNA amplification occurs, but reaction time exceeds two hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplification speedVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional external heating with electromagnetic induction heating. The mini-current electromagnetic field generates heat directly within the DNA solution through induced currents, achieving rapid and uniform temperature distribution. This eliminates the time required for heat transfer from external heating elements, reducing the overall reaction time from over two hours to under one hour while maintaining complete DNA amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic electromagnetic field application with controlled frequency and amplitude modulation. By using alternating current at optimized frequencies, the system creates periodic heating cycles that efficiently raise the temperature to the required range quickly, then maintain it with minimal fluctuation. This periodic action enables faster thermal equilibration and reduces the total amplification time compared to conventional continuous heating methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If conventional PCR heating equipment is used, then DNA amplification is achieved, but operating and maintenance time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost-effectivenessVSAvoidheating system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex thermal management systems with a simpler electromagnetic field generation system. Instead of requiring heating elements, temperature sensors, insulation, and cooling mechanisms, the invention uses a mini-current electromagnetic field source that can be integrated into the reaction vessel. This substitution dramatically reduces device complexity, maintenance requirements, and operating costs while achieving the same amplification function more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a more efficient and cost-effective PCR process with reduced reaction times and increased DNA amplification, minimizing DNA loss and errors, and lowering operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

exposing the nucleic acid to an electromagnetic field, for example a mini-current electromagnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

exposing the nucleic acid to an electromagnetic field, for example a mini-current electromagnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9044729B2Methods and devices for electromagnetic amplification of nucleic acids
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 INT PARK OF CREATIVITY
  • US9044729B2 patent drawing
  • US9044729B2 patent drawing
  • US9044729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and devices for amplifying nucleic acids generally involve exposing the nucleic acid to an electromagnetic field, for example a mini-current magnetic field, while performing the steps of PCR. The PCR methods and devices provide numerous advantages over conventional PCR techniques and systems such as reduced reaction times, no heating requirements, and reduced amounts of reagents (e.g., optional use polymerases and primers). Additionally, the PCR methods and devices require significantly shorter reaction times (e.g., less than one hour) compared to conventional PCR techniques and systems (minimum 2 hours). Finally, as shown in the Examples, the PCR methods and devices amplify significantly more DNA compared to conventional PCR techniques and systems. Accordingly, the PCR methods and devices provide a more efficient and cost-effective way to perform PCR when compared to conventional PCR techniques and systems.