Electromagnetic Pawl Trigger for Fast Explosion Suppression Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quickly triggering extinguishing systems for explosion suppression face challenges in achieving short triggering times due to the limitations of conventional mechanical trigger systems, which are complex, costly, and require high maintenance, especially when replacing explosives with mechanical means.

Innovation Solution

A triggering device utilizing an electromagnet to directly act on a pawl body, minimizing moving parts and system friction, with a pivotally mounted pawl body and return spring for enhanced dynamics and reliability, and an electromechanical actuator for remote locking and monitoring, allowing for automatic test triggering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional mechanical trigger systems are used, then the triggering mechanism is simple in structure, but the triggering time is too long to meet explosion suppression requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetriggering timeVSAvoidtrigger system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical trigger systems with an electromagnet-based triggering mechanism. The electromagnet (6) directly acts on the pawl body (5) to release the catch (3) from the pawl flank (4), eliminating complex mechanical linkages and achieving triggering times of less than 10 ms while maintaining system simplicity through direct electromagnetic actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes intermediate mechanical components from the trigger system. By having the electromagnet act directly on the pawl body without intermediate rolling elements or complex gear mechanisms, the system achieves both reduced complexity and faster triggering response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Speed

If explosives are used for triggering, then the triggering speed is sufficient, but the costs and handling requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetriggering speedVSAvoidmanufacturing and handling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes explosives with an electromagnet-based mechanical triggering system. The electromagnet (6) can be controlled electronically to achieve the required triggering speed while eliminating all associated costs and handling requirements of explosives, including storage, transport, and safety regulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The electromagnet system can be integrated with the control system to provide automatic triggering based on sensor input, eliminating the need for manual intervention or complex safety procedures associated with explosive handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If the electromagnet acts directly on the pawl body, then the number of moving parts is reduced, but the force required to overcome system friction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of moving partsVSAvoidelectromagnet force requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic design elements including a pivotally mounted pawl body (5) that rotates about a pivot point (7), and a return spring (9) that provides prestress in the engagement direction. These dynamic elements reduce the static friction that would otherwise require excessive electromagnetic force, allowing the electromagnet to effectively move the pawl body with fewer intermediate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the air gap between the electromagnet and pawl body, and adjusts the pivot point position and return spring prestress to achieve the optimal balance between electromagnetic force requirements and friction overcome capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves highly dynamic and reliable triggering with reduced maintenance costs and increased operational reliability, minimizing system friction and complexity, while ensuring safety and efficient energy use.

Implementation Method 1

the pawl body can be moved to release the engagement of the catch and the pawl flank and to release the sliding pin by means of at least one electromagnet which acts directly on the pawl body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 2

the pawl body can be prestressed by means of a return spring in the direction of engagement of the catch and pawl flank. The return spring is used not only to reset after a test triggering but also to protect against vibrations and impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11850459B2Triggering device of an extinguishing system
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 HOERBIGER WIEN GMBH
  • US11850459B2 patent drawing
  • US11850459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the invention are directed to a triggering device for a quickly triggering extinguishing system for explosion suppression. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the triggering device may include a pawl body having a pawl flank, a catch, at least one electromagnet to transmit an electromagnetic field, and a sliding pin. The sliding pin triggers an extinguishing system for explosion suppression by movement from a blocking position into a release position. In the blocking position, the sliding pin is pushed against the pawl flank of the pawl body by means of the catch and is held in the blocking position by said pawl flank. The pawl body releases the engagement of the catch and the pawl flank, and thereby releases the sliding pin, in response to the at least one electromagnet exerting the electromagnetic field on the pawl body.