Electromechanical Lock Fulcrum Return Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electromechanical locks require refinement to minimize electric power consumption, especially during the return to a closed state, which is crucial for self-powered or sporadically energy-importing locks.

Innovation Solution

An electromechanical lock design incorporating an electronic circuit for data reading, a fulcrum support moved by electric power to an open position, a locking mechanism for mechanical engagement, a lever for storing and outputting mechanical energy to disengage the locking mechanism, and a return mechanism using a reset spring to revert the fulcrum to a locked position, leveraging both electric and mechanical power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electric power is used to move the fulcrum support to open the lock, then the lock can be opened reliably, but electric power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock opening reliabilityVSAvoidelectric power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lock mechanism dynamically switches between electrically actuated opening (for security) and mechanically assisted closing (for energy saving). The fulcrum support moves electrically during opening but can return mechanically during closing, adapting the power source based on operational phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The return spring stores mechanical energy during the opening phase when the fulcrum support moves, and automatically releases this stored energy to assist in returning the fulcrum support to the locked position, making the system partially self-powered for the closing operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Use of energy by moving object

If a return spring is used to assist the return of the fulcrum support, then power consumption is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The return spring mechanism is integrated into the existing fulcrum support structure, combining the spring's return function with the lock's opening/closing motion. This merging avoids adding a separate, complex return mechanism while still achieving energy savings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The return spring serves multiple functions: it stores energy during opening, assists during closing, and maintains proper tension on the fulcrum support throughout operation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Power

If the lever stores mechanical energy to disengage the locking mechanism, then mechanical power transmission is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical power transmissionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lever pre-stores mechanical energy in the return spring during the opening phase, preparing the system in advance for the closing operation. This preliminary energy storage ensures sufficient power is available when needed to disengage the locking mechanism and return the fulcrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design optimizes power consumption by utilizing electric power efficiently for the lock's operation and mechanical energy for the return mechanism, ensuring low power usage and reliable locking functionality.

Implementation Method 1

a lever coupled with the locking mechanism configured to receive mechanical power from an user to store mechanical energy to a return spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy storage and release: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a return mechanism for the support of the fulcrum comprising a reset spring whose other end is configured to, during the reception of the mechanical power from the user, move past the support of the fulcrum with the mechanical power outputted by the lever, and, finally, force the support of the fulcrum with the mechanical energy outputted by the return spring back to a locked position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS9574376B2Electromechanical lock
Publication Date: 2017.02.21 ILOQ OY
  • US9574376B2 patent drawing
  • US9574376B2 patent drawing
  • US9574376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromechanical lock includes a lever coupled with a locking mechanism configured to receive mechanical power from an user, and to output the mechanical power to mechanically disengage the locking mechanism provided that a support of the fulcrum is in an open position, and a return mechanism for the support of the fulcrum including a reset spring whose other end is configured to, during the reception of the mechanical power from the user, move past the support of the fulcrum with the mechanical power outputted by the lever, and, finally, force the support of the fulcrum with the mechanical energy outputted by the return spring through the lever back to a locked position.