Electromechanical Lock With Side-by-Side Magnets for Stronger Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromechanical locks face challenges in generating sufficient magnetic field forces due to axial placement of magnets, complicating design and implementation.

Innovation Solution

The use of a movable permanent magnet and a stationary semi-hard magnet, combined with an electrically powered magnetization coil, allows for switching the polarity of the semi-hard magnet between configurations to generate stronger magnetic fields, enabling efficient movement of the movable magnet between positions for locking and unlocking states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If magnets are placed axially against each other, then the lock structure is compact, but the generated magnetic field forces are relatively small

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field forceVSAvoidlock design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from axial magnet placement (one-dimensional arrangement) to radial magnet placement (two-dimensional arrangement). The movable magnet and stationary magnet are positioned with their magnetic axes parallel and adjacent to each other, creating a radial magnetic field configuration that generates stronger magnetic forces while maintaining compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric arrangement parameter of the magnets from axial to radial placement. This parameter change fundamentally alters the magnetic field distribution and force generation characteristics, enabling stronger magnetic forces without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If magnets are placed axially against each other, then the alignment is simple, but the magnetic forces generated are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field forceVSAvoidmagnet placement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts radial magnet placement where the magnetic axes of the movable and stationary magnets are parallel and adjacent, rather than axial placement. This dimensional change creates stronger magnetic forces while the magnets remain surrounded by magnetization coils for straightforward manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetization coils as intermediaries that surround both the movable and stationary magnets. These coils facilitate the magnetization process and enable polarity switching, simplifying the manufacturing of strongly magnetized components without requiring complex direct magnet-to-magnet alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a magnetization coil surrounds the stationary magnet, then the polarity can be switched electrically, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolarity switching capabilityVSAvoidcoil and magnet structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetization coil serves multiple functions: it magnetizes the stationary magnet during assembly, enables polarity switching during operation, and can be used for demagnetization if needed. This multi-functionality justifies the added component while providing versatile control over the magnetic field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the magnetic configuration dynamic by using an electrically powered magnetization coil that can switch the polarity of the stationary magnet. This dynamic capability allows the lock to transition between locked and unlocked states through electrical control, enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the magnetic forces, simplifying the design and implementation of electromechanical locks by providing greater security, reduced size, and improved electrical efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an electrically powered magnetization coil (104) positioned adjacent to the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) and configured to switch a polarity of the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) between a first magnetization configuration and a second magnetization configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

In the first magnetization configuration, the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) attracts the movable permanent magnet (100) to a first position. In the second magnetization configuration, the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) repels the movable permanent magnet (100) to a second position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction and repulsion: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP3825496B1Electromechanical lock and method
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 ILOQ OY
  • EP3825496B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1F
  • EP3825496B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2E
  • EP3825496B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3E

AI summary

Electromechanical lock and method are disclosed. The lock includes: a movable permanent magnet (100) to move between a first position (120) and a second position (140); a stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102); and an electrically powered magnetization coil (104) positioned adjacent to the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) to switch a polarity of the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) between a first magnetization configuration (S-N) and a second magnetization configuration (N-S). The first magnetization configuration (S-N) of the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) attracts (122) the movable permanent magnet (100) to the first position (120). The second magnetization configuration (N-S) of the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102) repels (142) the movable permanent magnet to the second position (140). A magnetic axis (108) of the movable permanent magnet (100) is side by side with a magnetic axis (110) of the stationary permanent semi-hard magnet (102).