Electromechanical Lock with Offset Electromagnet and Movable Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromechanical locks require powerful and bulky electromagnets for safety exits, which are expensive and unreliable, and can get stuck in partially protruding positions during power cuts, preventing door opening.

Innovation Solution

The electromechanical lock design features a non-parallel retaining direction for the electromagnetic means relative to the bolt's translational movement, reducing the necessary retaining force and using a less powerful electromagnet, combined with a movable assembly and inclined striker to ensure door opening in emergency situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a powerful electromagnet is used to ensure door resistance standards, then the locking reliability is improved, but the device size and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidelectromagnet size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the spatial relationship between the electromagnet and bolt by making their action directions non-parallel. The electromagnet acts in a direction that is offset from the bolt's translational direction, creating a moment arm that amplifies the locking effect. This dimensional change allows a smaller electromagnet to achieve the same locking reliability as a much larger coaxial electromagnet would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a movable assembly that can change position between a first position (when bolt is protruding) and a second position (when bolt is retracted). This dynamic element allows the system to optimize the electromagnetic interaction at different stages of operation, enabling reliable locking with reduced electromagnet size compared to static coaxial designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a worm screw mechanism is used with the electric motor, then the bolt translation is achieved, but the system complexity increases due to required limit switches and returning mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebolt actuationVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the screw mechanism from the system and replaces it with a direct-acting electric cylinder. The electric cylinder's rod moves in a direction offset from the bolt's translational direction, but this simple linear actuation eliminates the need for complex worm screw mechanisms, limit switches, and returning mechanisms, significantly reducing system complexity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a movable assembly as an intermediary between the electric cylinder and the bolt. This assembly translates the offset motion of the electric cylinder rod into the required bolt translation, and also serves as the component that interacts with the electromagnet. This intermediary simplifies the overall mechanism by eliminating the need for complex screw mechanisms and limit switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Force

If the electromagnet and motor directions are made non-parallel, then the retaining force requirement is reduced, but the mechanical linkage complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretaining forceVSAvoidmechanical linkage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movable assembly serves as an intermediary that simplifies the mechanical linkage. It directly translates the offset motion of the electric cylinder rod into bolt translation, and provides a simple interface for the electromagnet's non-parallel action. This intermediary eliminates the need for complex mechanical linkages that would otherwise be required to coordinate the offset motions of multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design provides a compact, reliable, and cost-effective lock that automatically releases doors during power failures, ensuring safe evacuation while maintaining mechanical resistance and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

an electromagnetic means retaining said bolt in the protruding position when it is supplied with electric current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 2

a return means acting permanently on said bolt to cause it to pass from the protruding position to the retracted position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP1950364B1Device for activating a bolt and door equipped with said device
Publication Date: 2013.12.18 SAINT GOBAIN SEVA SA
  • EP1950364B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1950364B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1950364B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The device has an electromagnetic unit i.e. electromagnetic locking member (13), presenting a non parallel retaining direction that is perpendicular to a translational movement direction of a bolt (4). An electrical actuator (11) i.e. electric jack, has a non parallel action direction that is perpendicular to the translational movement direction of the bolt. A mobile assembly (8) includes a pusher (9) sandwiched between the actuator and the member. The actuator is positioned diametrically opposite to the member with respect to the translational movement direction of the bolt.