Electro-Mechanical Transmission Control Optimizing Input Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing powertrain control systems for electro-mechanical transmissions face challenges in efficiently managing torque and rotational speed across various operating range states, leading to suboptimal fuel economy, emissions, and frequent shifting, particularly in response to changing road conditions and operator torque demands.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the current and potential transmission operating range states and engine states, calculates preferred input speeds with associated power inputs and losses, applies biasing costs to lower input speeds, and weights preferability factors to selectively change the operating states based on operator torque requests and system conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the transmission control system frequently shifts between operating range states in response to changing road conditions and operator torque demands, then the system adapts quickly to varying conditions, but fuel economy deteriorates and emissions increase due to suboptimal torque management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system pre-calculates and stores optimal input speeds and associated power losses for each potential transmission operating range state before actual shifting occurs. This preliminary preparation allows the system to execute shifts with optimized torque management, avoiding the energy-wasting trial-and-error approach of conventional systems that react to conditions without pre-planned optimization strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating range state selection and input speed optimization based on real-time conditions including road conditions and operator torque demands. The control system continuously evaluates multiple potential states and selectively commands changes based on preferability factors, enabling adaptive optimization that responds to changing conditions while maintaining fuel efficiency through intelligent state selection rather than frequent arbitrary shifts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the transmission control system uses a simple control algorithm, then the system complexity is reduced, but the precision of torque management deteriorates leading to suboptimal fuel economy and frequent shifting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidtorque management precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm segments the transmission operating space into distinct operating range states with specific characteristics. By dividing the continuous operating space into discrete states (each with defined minimum input speeds and associated power losses), the system achieves precise torque management through state-based control rather than continuous complex calculations. This segmentation allows the controller to select from predefined optimal states based on preferability factors, maintaining precision while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the transmission operates without biasing costs for lower input speeds, then the system has greater operational flexibility, but power losses increase due to suboptimal input speed selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidpower losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system modifies the cost function parameters by introducing biasing costs that vary with input speed magnitude. This parameter change transforms the optimization criterion from purely power-loss-based to a composite metric that incorporates both power losses and biasing costs. The biasing cost magnitude is proportional to the difference between selected input speed and minimum input speed for each state, guiding the system to prefer operating points that minimize power losses while maintaining operational flexibility through selective state transitions based on overall preferability factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2055598B1Method for selection of optimal mode, gear and input speed for preselect or tap up respectively down operation
Publication Date: 2014.12.24 CHRYSLER CORPORATION
  • EP2055598B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2055598B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2055598B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A powertrain system includes an engine (14) mechanically coupled to an electro-mechanical transmission (10) at an input (12) thereto selectively operative in one of a plurality of transmission operating range states and one of a plurality of engine states. A method for controlling the powertrain system includes combining sets of preferability factors inputted from engine sensors in a microprocessor or computer with other preferability factors generated during engine (14) and vehicle operation to provide an output for a transmission control module (17), which may execute an operating range or engine state change.