3D Laminating Apparatus Electron Beam Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional three-dimensional laminating and shaping apparatuses require manual adjustment of electron beam irradiation conditions due to changes in powder layer thickness and beam current, making it difficult to ensure consistent melting and combination of powder layers.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a powder feeding unit, an electron beam column, an electron detector, a melting judging unit, and a deflection controller to automatically adjust irradiation conditions based on detection signal strength, ensuring the powder layer is melted and combined effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual adjustment of electron beam irradiation conditions is used, then the apparatus structure remains simple, but the consistency and reliability of powder layer melting and combination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of powder layer melting and combinationVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the electron detector monitors secondary electrons emitted from the powder layer surface during electron beam irradiation. The detection signal strength is fed back to the control unit, which automatically adjusts electron beam irradiation conditions (accelerating voltage, current value, irradiation time) to maintain consistent melting and combination quality despite variations in powder layer thickness or material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus performs self-adjustment of irradiation conditions through the automated feedback loop. The control unit autonomously determines optimal irradiation parameters based on real-time detection signals, eliminating the need for manual intervention and ensuring consistent processing quality without requiring complex manual adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If preset irradiation conditions are used, then the operation is simple, but the adaptability to changes in powder layer thickness and beam current deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to powder layer variationsVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the detection signal strength from the electron detector and automatically adjusts irradiation conditions in real-time. This feedback mechanism enables the apparatus to adapt to variations in powder layer thickness, material composition, and beam current without requiring manual reconfiguration, thereby maintaining high adaptability while keeping the operation simple for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static preset irradiation conditions to dynamic adaptive control. The control unit continuously adjusts irradiation parameters (accelerating voltage, current value, irradiation time) based on real-time detection signals, enabling the system to dynamically adapt to changing conditions while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If automatic determination of irradiation conditions is implemented, then the adaptability to powder layer variations improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to powder layer variationsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a feedback control system where the electron detector and control unit work together to automatically determine optimal irradiation conditions. The control unit processes detection signal strength and autonomously adjusts electron beam parameters, providing adaptability to powder layer variations while keeping the control system complexity manageable through integrated automation rather than multiple separate adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus can autonomously determine optimal irradiation conditions, ensuring consistent melting and combination of powder layers, improving the accuracy and efficiency of three-dimensional structure formation.

Implementation Method 1

irradiate, with an electron beam, a predetermined area of a powder layer that is made of a metal material and the like so that a portion of the powder layer melts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam irradiation: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

a portion of the powder layer melts and then becomes combined with an underlying structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

an electron detector configured to detect an electron emitted from the front surface of the powder layer as a result of irradiation with the electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron emission: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS10919105B2Three-dimensional laminating and shaping apparatus and laminating and shaping method
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 ADVANTEST CORP
  • US10919105B2 patent drawing
  • US10919105B2 patent drawing
  • US10919105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a three-dimensional laminating and shaping apparatus 100 including a column unit 200 that is configured to output an electron beam EB and deflect the electron beam EB toward the front surface of a powder layer 32, an electron detector 72 that is configured to detect electrons that may be emitted in a predetermined direction from the front surface of the powder layer 32 when the powder layer 32 is irradiated with the electron beam EB, a melting judging unit 410 that is configured to generate a melting signal based on the strength of the detection signal from the electron detector 72, and a deflection controller 420 that is configured to receive the melting signal to determine the condition of the irradiation the electron beam.