Electron Beam Web Roller Shielding for X-Ray Containment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electron beam apparatuses used for processing webs face challenges in reducing wear, improving serviceability, maintaining operator safety, and optimizing energy usage while managing secondary radiation hazards.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus incorporates features such as a roller with circumferential radiation shielding, a reaction chamber with inert gas dispensing, internal baffles, and a movable electron beam emitter to control radiation exposure and enhance operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If electron beam apparatuses are used to process webs, then chemical processes such as cross-linking of polymers and polymerization of polymer precursors can be achieved, but secondary radiation is generated that may be harmful to people and may degrade parts, materials and lubricants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical process capabilityVSAvoidsecondary radiation harm
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by using the harmful secondary radiation (X-rays) generated during electron beam processing to achieve beneficial chemical processes. The radiation that would normally be considered a hazard is utilized to drive polymerization and cross-linking reactions in the web material, converting a harmful byproduct into a useful processing mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary substance (oxygen or oxygen-containing compound) between the electron beam and the web material. This intermediary absorbs excess radiation energy and controls the chemical reactions, reducing harmful effects while maintaining beneficial processing outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If radiation shielding is added to protect against secondary radiation, then operator safety and material protection are improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation protectionVSAvoidshielding structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the reaction chamber serve multiple functions: it acts as both the processing environment for the electron beam and the web material, and simultaneously as radiation shielding containment. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate shielding structures, simplifying the overall device design while maintaining protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the radiation shielding function with the reaction chamber structure. The chamber that contains and controls the chemical processing environment also serves as the primary radiation containment barrier, merging two functions into a single integrated component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the reaction chamber is designed to contain radiation, then safety is improved, but access for maintenance and serviceability becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation containmentVSAvoidserviceability access
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the reaction chamber into separable sections or components that can be independently accessed. This segmentation allows maintenance personnel to access specific areas for service and repair while the rest of the chamber remains sealed and contained, maintaining radiation protection while improving serviceability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If electron beam processing is used to improve web treatment, then productivity is enhanced, but energy consumption and wear of components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweb processing efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic or pulsed electron beam irradiation rather than continuous exposure. This periodic action maintains high processing productivity while allowing intervals that reduce cumulative energy consumption and minimize thermal buildup that would increase component wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces radiation exposure, improves safety, and enhances the operational efficiency and serviceability of electron beam processing systems, addressing the challenges of wear and energy usage.

Implementation Method 1

They produce accelerated electrons that ionize some materials. This ionization can be useful in a various processes, including as examples, chemical processes that include cross-linking of polymers and/or polymerization of polymer precursors.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 2

The electrons also result in the generation of secondary radiation. These may, depending of several factors, be harmful to people and may degrade parts, materials and lubricants.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBremsstrahlung radiation:

Data Source

PatentUS8106369B2Electron beam web irradiation apparatus and process
Publication Date: 2012.01.31 PCT EBEAM & INTEGRATION LLC
  • US8106369B2 patent drawing
  • US8106369B2 patent drawing
  • US8106369B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure includes an electron beam emitter, a roller for a web, circumferential radiation shielding, a reaction chamber, movement between open and closes positions, a depositor, baffles, inert gas dispenser, and other features. One example in the present disclosure is a web carrying roller for electron beam irradiation of the web on one side of that roller within a baffle-containing shielded area, while another side of that roller is outside of the shielded area, and near the two ends of the roller are arcuate tongue and groove barriers to x-radiation leakage from the shielded area. The baffle-containing shielded area has a series of voids separated by walls, rather than having the shielded area positioned close to the circumference of the cylinder along its length.