Electron Beam Splitter Using Oscillating Electric Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electron beam splitters in electron microscopy suffer from significant beam loss, limited splitting capability, and sensitivity to external interference, making them unsuitable for high-resolution and low-radiation applications.

Innovation Solution

An electron beam splitter utilizing a multi-pole electrode arrangement subjected to high-frequency alternating voltage, generating oscillating electric fields that create a pseudopotential with a single local minimum on the input side and multiple local minima on the output side, allowing for efficient and large-scale beam splitting without forward energy loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If an electrostatic biprism is used to split the electron beam, then the beam can be diffracted, but a portion of the electron beam inevitably hits the biprism filament and is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron beam lossVSAvoidbeam splitting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical electrostatic biprism system with a standing light wave optical system. Instead of using a physical charged filament that blocks and diffracts electrons, the invention uses a Kármán-Dirac optical grating where a standing light wave modulates the electron beam through optical forces, eliminating direct contact and beam loss on a physical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces light (electromagnetic field) as an intermediary between the electron beam and the splitting mechanism. The standing light wave acts as a mediator that transfers momentum to electrons through optical forces, enabling beam splitting without requiring direct interaction with a physical biprism structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If diffraction at a crystal is used for beam splitting, then beam splitting is achieved, but losses occur in higher diffraction orders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron beam lossVSAvoiddiffraction order control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the splitting mechanism from crystal lattice diffraction to optical field modulation. By using a standing light wave with adjustable frequency and intensity, the system can control electron distribution in first and higher diffraction orders without the inherent losses of crystal diffraction, as the optical potential can be dynamically tuned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If a double slit is used to split the electron beam, then beam splitting is achieved, but transmission is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidbeam splitting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical double-slit structure with an optical standing wave field. Instead of electrons passing through physical slits that block most of the beam, the standing light wave creates a periodic potential that guides electrons into multiple trajectories, dramatically improving transmission efficiency while maintaining splitting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of energy

If a magnetic biprism is used for beam splitting, then beam splitting is achieved, but the transmission of electrons through magnetic material is reduced, resulting in a reduction in coherence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron transmissionVSAvoidbeam coherence
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the magnetic field-based splitting mechanism with an optical field-based mechanism. Instead of electrons passing through magnetic material that reduces transmission and coherence, the standing light wave creates an optical potential that interacts with electrons without requiring them to traverse magnetic matter, preserving both transmission and coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Length of stationary object

If an electron beam splitter is designed to achieve large beam splitting for sample placement, then a large separation is achieved, but the system becomes more sensitive to external interference and less robust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam separation distanceVSAvoidrobustness against external disturbances
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a standing light wave with high frequency oscillation to create the beam splitting effect. The periodic nature of the optical field provides a stable, controllable potential landscape that can maintain large beam separation while being less susceptible to external disturbances, as the rapid oscillation averages out many perturbations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables loss-free and adiabatic splitting of electron beams with minimal momentum change, suitable for interferometric applications, and is robust against external disturbances, facilitating high-resolution imaging with reduced radiation exposure.

Implementation Method 1

the electrode arrangement having a first number of electrodes to which voltage is applied on the entry side generates a first oscillating electric field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOscillating electric field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

which forms a single local inclusion minimum in a transverse plane averaged over time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPseudopotential: Potential Well

Implementation Method 3

a stable transverse confinement of charged particles can be generated, which can be described by a time-averaged pseudopotential

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime-averaged pseudopotential: Potential Well

Implementation Method 4

the linear Paul trap is based on alternating quadrupole electric fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuadrupole electric field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 5

higher-order multipole fields can also generate pseudopotentials according to this principle, which have two or more locally separate inclusion minima

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMultipole field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentEP3161852B1Electron beam splitter
Publication Date: 2018.06.27 FRIEDRICH ALEXANDER UNIV ERLANGEN NUERNBERG
  • EP3161852B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3161852B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3161852B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to an electron beam splitter (1) comprising a multi-pole electrode arrangement (5) which can be supplied with a high-frequency AC voltage and which extends along a specified path (6) from an inlet side (9) to an outlet side (10). The electrode arrangement (5) generates a first oscillating electric field (61) at the inlet side (9) by means of a first number of electrodes (7) supplied with a voltage, said electric field forming a single local confinement minimum (62) on a transversal plane in a time-averaged manner, and the electrode arrangement (5) generates a second oscillating electric field (65) at least at the outlet side (10) by means of a second number of electrodes (7) supplied with a voltage, said electric field forming at least two local confinement minima (66, 67) on a transversal plane in a time-averaged manner.