Electron Microscope Pattern Measurement Shrinkage Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring fine patterns in semiconductor manufacturing, such as those using ArF lithography, face challenges in accurately estimating shrinkage and correcting errors caused by charging and primary coating material influences, especially for complex two-dimensional shapes and varying primary coating materials, leading to imprecise dimension and contour measurements.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a charged particle beam on a sample with a different primary coating material, along with data processing to calculate pre-shrinking dimensions and contours by accounting for pattern and primary coating material shrinkage parameters, and beam conditions, utilizing image processing techniques to correct for charging errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a charged particle beam (electron beam) is used to measure the fine resist sample, then the measurement process can be performed, but the pattern contracts (shrinks) due to irradiation and the dimension and shape change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern dimension measurementVSAvoidpattern dimension accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs multiple measurements before significant shrinkage occurs and uses the initial measurement as a reference. By conducting measurements in sequence and comparing subsequent measurements to the first measurement, the system captures dimensional changes due to shrinkage and corrects for them, thereby obtaining accurate pre-shrinkage dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where measurement results are used to correct subsequent measurements. The system calculates shrinkage based on the difference between the first measurement and subsequent measurements, then applies this correction to obtain accurate dimensional data, creating a closed-loop correction mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If a charged particle beam is used to measure the fine resist sample, then the measurement can be performed, but charging occurs on the sample surface causing orbit changes and signal electron return, making the SEM image locally dark

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern contour measurementVSAvoidcharging effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback by comparing the first SEM image (taken before significant charging occurs) with subsequent images. The system detects local darkening caused by charging and uses the initial image as a reference to correct the contour information, thereby compensating for charging effects and maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple measurements are performed to estimate shrinkage, then the shrink curve can be obtained, but the measurement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrinkage estimation accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the first measurement quickly as a reference point before significant shrinkage occurs. By establishing this initial reference measurement, the system reduces the need for numerous subsequent measurements to determine pre-shrinkage dimensions, as the first measurement already provides baseline data for correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables highly precise determination of pattern contours and dimensions, even under electron beam irradiation, by accurately accounting for primary coating material influences and charging effects, improving measurement accuracy for complex patterns.

Implementation Method 1

contraction (shrink) of the pattern of the resist sample caused by irradiation with an electron beam is generated and the dimension and the shape are changed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShrinkage: Thermal Contraction

Implementation Method 2

since the resist sample is generally an insulator, there are cases where charging occurs on the sample surface caused by irradiation with the electron beam. In a case where charging occurs, the orbit of an incident electron beam is changed and some of signal electrons generated from the sample are brought back by positive charging of the sample surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharging: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS9305744B2Measuring method, data processing apparatus and electron microscope using same
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP
  • US9305744B2 patent drawing
  • US9305744B2 patent drawing
  • US9305744B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The objective of the invention is to provide a measuring method that can determine pattern contours and dimensions with high precision even if an object to be measured shrinks due to electron beam radiations. In order to achieve this objective, a method, which performs measurements by irradiating an electron beam onto a sample having a pattern formed on a primary coating thereof, prepares an SEM image and contour of the pattern (S201, S202), material parameters of the pattern part and primary coating part of the sample (S203, S204), and a beam condition in irradiating the electron beam onto the sample (S205), and uses these prepared things to calculate a pattern shape or dimensions before the irradiation of the electron beam (S206).