Electronic Abacus with Sensor Feedback for Calculation Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abacus-based training systems struggle to identify the exact operation where mistakes are made during multiple operations, leading to incorrect solutions for high-level complexities and are not suitable for group training, as they do not accommodate varying student skills.

Innovation Solution

An electronic abacus system with sensors and light source units that allow users to solve mathematical operations step-by-step, providing feedback on correct or incorrect bead placements and adjusting difficulty levels based on individual student skills, and enabling group training through synchronized problem-solving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing abacus-based training systems are used for multiple operations, then calculation training is provided, but the exact operation where mistakes are made cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the calculation process into individual operations, with each operation having dedicated sensors that detect bead positions and determine whether the operation was performed correctly. This segmentation enables precise error detection at the operation level without requiring complex centralized analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements immediate feedback by comparing the detected bead configuration against the expected result for each operation. When an error is detected, the system provides real-time feedback to the student, enabling precise identification of where mistakes occur in the calculation sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If existing training systems accommodate all students, then group training is enabled, but individual skill levels cannot be differentiated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill level adaptationVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the difficulty level and type of mathematical operations based on each student's performance. The processing unit monitors accuracy and progression, automatically adapting the training regimen to match individual skill levels while maintaining group training functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The abacus system is designed to serve multiple skill levels simultaneously through a universal interface. The same physical device can accommodate beginners working on basic operations while advanced students tackle complex calculations, with the system automatically differentiating and adapting to each user's needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If students make mistakes in low-level operations, then high-level operations must be performed, but accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation accuracyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of each operation before allowing progression to the next step. By checking bead positions and verifying operation correctness in advance, the system prevents accumulation of errors and ensures foundational accuracy before tackling more complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual error checking with automated sensor-based detection and processing unit analysis. This substitution of mechanical verification with electronic detection improves reliability by eliminating human oversight errors and providing consistent, accurate validation of each calculation step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively helps students develop mental calculation skills by providing real-time feedback and adjusting exercises to individual skill levels, facilitating group training and improving accuracy in solving complex mathematical operations.

Implementation Method 1

the sensors are infrared detectors, with each of the infrared detectors being located within one of the cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

the light source units are light-emitting diodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS10168729B1Apparatus and system for teaching calculation skills
Publication Date: 2019.01.01 NOVOSOLOV IURII OLEKSANDROVYCH
  • US10168729B1 patent drawing
  • US10168729B1 patent drawing
  • US10168729B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an apparatus for teaching calculation skills. The apparatus may include a plurality of beads and a set of columns of the cells being configured to be occupied by one of the beads. The apparatus may include a set of sensors configured to determine occupation of the cells by the beads, and a processing unit electronically coupled to the set of sensors. The processing unit can be configured to: receive from a server at least one array of integer numbers. Each of the integer numbers represents an intermediate result of solving of a sequence of mathematical operations displayed to a user; determine, via the set of sensors, occupation of the cells by the beads; translate the occupation of cells to a check number; and compare the check number to a current number in array to determine whether the current operation is solved correctly.