Electronic Brake Caliper Actuation for Modular Vehicle Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional antilock braking systems (ABS) and electronic stability control (ESC) are complex, heavy, and expensive due to their combination of electronic and hydraulic components, which complicates manufacturing, increases maintenance time, and reduces modularity in vehicles.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an electronic braking system that uses localized electro-mechanical actuation instead of hydraulic components, allowing for independent control of each wheel and separating ABS and ESC functions, reducing the number of components and weight while enhancing modularity and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional hydraulic components are used in ABS and ESC systems, then braking force can be effectively applied, but the system becomes complex and heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the braking system into independent electronic actuators at each wheel, with each actuator independently controlling brake pad application. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex hydraulic distribution systems while maintaining effective braking force at each wheel independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the hydraulic mechanical system with an electro-mechanical system using electric motors or linear actuators to directly apply braking force. This substitution eliminates hydraulic fluid, reservoirs, valves, and piping, significantly reducing system complexity while maintaining braking effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional hydraulic components are used in ABS and ESC systems, then braking function is maintained, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes all hydraulic components (fluid, reservoirs, valves, piping) from the braking system, retaining only the essential braking function through electro-mechanical actuators. This extraction eliminates unnecessary weight while preserving the core braking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional ABS and ESC systems are implemented, then vehicle control functions are achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control functionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the braking control system into independent modular units at each wheel, where each unit contains its own actuator and control electronics. This modularity simplifies manufacturing by allowing standardized components to be produced independently and assembled, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while maintaining full vehicle control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If conventional hydraulic systems are used, then braking control is achieved, but maintenance time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking controlVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic system with an electro-mechanical system that eliminates hydraulic fluid, which requires periodic replacement and system bleeding. The electric actuators and electronic control systems have fewer wear components and no fluid maintenance requirements, significantly reducing maintenance time while preserving braking control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution decreases the complexity and weight of the braking system, improves control and modularity, and reduces maintenance time, while also providing redundancy for safety, particularly beneficial in autonomous vehicles where regenerative braking can handle most braking duties.

Implementation Method 1

an electronic brake caliper assembly can comprise an electronic brake caliper assembly, mounted proximate a wheel of a vehicle. In some examples, the electronic brake caliper assembly can comprise a brake caliper, one or more brake pads, mounted in the brake caliper, the one or more brake pads to generate friction on a brake rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-mechanical actuation: Linear Motor

Implementation Method 2

the one or more brake pads to generate friction on a brake rotor detachably coupled to the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11654891B2Electronic braking systems and methods
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 ZOOX INC
  • US11654891B2 patent drawing
  • US11654891B2 patent drawing
  • US11654891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic braking system with independent antilock braking and stability control. The system can utilize a variety of electro-mechanical actuators to apply clamping force to a mechanical brake caliper. The system can include a caliper electronic control unit (CECU) and a wheel speed sensor at each wheel of the vehicle to enable independent slip control, or antilock braking, at each wheel. A separate executive management unit (EMU) can receive data from each electronic caliper, vehicle accelerometers, and other sensors to provide electronic stability control (ESC) independent of antilock braking (ABS) functions. The removal of a conventional master cylinder, brake pedal, ABS pump, brake lines, and other components can reduce weight and complexity. The elimination of hydraulic lines running to a central ABS module and master cylinder can enable modular drive units to be swapped out more quickly and efficiently.