Electronic Device Date-Time Interpretation Using Activity Context

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing voice recognition systems struggle to accurately identify user intent related to dates and times in user utterances, leading to potential misinterpretations and suboptimal service provision.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device equipped with an input module, processor, and memory that analyzes user utterances for dates and times, applying conditions to adjust detected dates and times based on user activity records, ensuring accurate interpretation and functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the voice recognition system directly uses the detected date and time from user utterance, then the processing speed is fast, but the interpretation accuracy deteriorates when multiple dates and times are possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedate and time interpretation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by checking multiple conditions (current date/time, activity records, sleep patterns) before finalizing the date and time interpretation. This preliminary action prevents misinterpretation by proactively identifying the most likely intended date and time through systematic condition evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the interpretation of date and time based on real-time context including current time, user activity records, and sleep patterns. Rather than using a fixed interpretation rule, the system adapts its interpretation logic according to the specific contextual conditions present at the time of the utterance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system applies multiple conditions to adjust detected dates and times, then the interpretation accuracy improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intent recognition accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks of activity records and contextual information before finalizing the date and time interpretation. By preparing and storing activity records in advance, the system can quickly reference them during utterance processing without performing complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the user's own activity records and device usage patterns to automatically determine the most likely intended date and time. This self-service approach eliminates the need for additional user input or manual clarification, resolving ambiguities through self-contained contextual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system changes detected dates and times based on activity records, then the service relevance improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice adaptability to user contextVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a unified contextual analysis mechanism that handles multiple functions including date/time interpretation, activity recognition, and user behavior analysis. This multi-functional approach allows the system to adapt to various user contexts using a single integrated framework rather than separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary contextual analysis layer that mediates between the raw utterance and the final interpretation. This intermediary layer processes activity records and contextual information to bridge the gap between user input and accurate intent recognition, simplifying the overall system architecture through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250232770A1Electronic device and method for processing user utterance in electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250232770A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232770A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232770A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, an electronic device, in case that a user utterance related to a date and time acquired through the input module is identified as a user utterance for performing a function, based on a date and time when the user utterance is acquired, identifies whether the date and time detected in the user utterance are interpreted as a plurality of dates and times. According to an embodiment, the electronic device, in case that the date and time detected in the user utterance are interpreted as the plurality of dates and times, changes the date detected in the user utterance if a first condition for changing the date is satisfied, and changes the time detected in the user utterance if user's activity record information satisfies a second condition. According to an embodiment, the electronic device recommends performing a function with the changed date or time.