Electronic Device Sentence Correction for Translation Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine translation models often produce low-quality translations due to the lack of familiarity between input sentences and the learning corpus, particularly when input sentences contain honorific expressions, grammatical features, or spacing differences not present in the training data, making it impractical to construct a comprehensive corpus for all human language expressions.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device corrects input sentences to make them more familiar to the learning corpus by using language models trained on parallel and mono corpora, determining the need for correction based on perplexity values, and then inputting the corrected sentences into a translation model to improve translation quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a translation model is trained on a limited learning corpus, then the model can be trained efficiently with available data, but the translation quality deteriorates when input sentences contain expressions not present in the corpus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation qualityVSAvoidhandling of unfamiliar expressions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary correction of the input sentence before translation by using a language model to generate a corrected version that is more likely to appear in the training corpus. This preliminary action ensures that the translation model receives familiar input patterns, thereby improving translation quality without requiring an expanded corpus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A correction model serves as an intermediary between the input sentence and the translation model. This intermediary component transforms unfamiliar or poorly formatted input sentences into corrected versions that better match the training corpus patterns, enabling the translation model to produce higher quality translations without changing the translation model itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the learning corpus is expanded to include all possible human language expressions, then the translation model can handle all expressions, but it becomes practically impossible to construct such a comprehensive corpus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of language expressionsVSAvoidcorpus construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating a comprehensive corpus covering all possible expressions, the system copies or replicates existing corpus patterns through the correction model. The correction model learns from the existing corpus and generates corrected sentences that follow the same patterns, effectively extending the corpus coverage without actually expanding the training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the input sentence (through correction) to match the distribution and patterns of the training corpus. By transforming unfamiliar expressions into familiar patterns, the system achieves broader effective coverage without requiring an expanded corpus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If correction is always applied to input sentences, then translation quality may improve for unfamiliar expressions, but unnecessary corrections may degrade translation quality for already optimal sentences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation quality for unfamiliar expressionsVSAvoidtranslation quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies correction selectively rather than universally. The correction model is trained to identify when correction is actually needed based on the input sentence characteristics, applying correction only in cases where it will improve translation quality while leaving already-optimal sentences unchanged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The correction model uses feedback from the language model and perplexity calculations to determine whether correction is necessary. By monitoring how well the input sentence matches the training corpus patterns, the system can decide whether correction will help or harm translation quality, thereby maintaining consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11604931B2Electronic device and controlling method of electronic device
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11604931B2 patent drawing
  • US11604931B2 patent drawing
  • US11604931B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device is provided. The electronic device includes a memory and a processor. The processor is configured to, based on acquiring a first sentence in a first language, determine whether to correct the first sentence to another sentence in the first language by using a second language model trained based on a learning corpus, and based on determining to correct the first sentence to another sentence in the first language, input the first sentence into a conversion model trained to acquire another sentence having a similarity greater than or equal to a threshold value to an input sentence and acquire a second sentence in the first language which is a corrected form of the first sentence, and based on acquiring the second sentence, input the second sentence into a translation model trained based on the learning corpus and acquire a third sentence in a second language.