Electronically Variable Inductor Circuit for Wider VCXO Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The tuning range of voltage-controlled crystal oscillators (VCXO) is limited due to the large fixed case capacitance, making it difficult to effectively decrease the resonant frequency using variable capacitance, as the motional capacitance is several orders of magnitude smaller, resulting in diminishing returns from adding variable capacitance.

Innovation Solution

A simulated variable inductor circuit is introduced, where a variable inductor is connected in parallel with the case capacitance, and an electronically controllable inductor is used to extend the tuning range by altering the equivalent capacitance, allowing for increased frequency control through electronic means rather than mechanical.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If variable capacitance is added in parallel with case capacitance to decrease resonant frequency, then frequency tuning capability is improved, but the effectiveness diminishes due to the large fixed case capacitance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency tuning capabilityVSAvoidtuning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical parameters of the resonant circuit by introducing a simulated inductor with variable inductance. By controlling the inductance parameter electronically (through voltage or current control of the operational amplifier and associated components), the resonant frequency can be tuned effectively despite the large fixed case capacitance. This parameter change approach allows the system to overcome the limitation of fixed capacitance values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a variable inductor is used to extend tuning range, then frequency control range is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning rangeVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical variable inductors (which would have moving parts) with an electronically controlled simulated inductor implemented using operational amplifiers, resistors, and capacitors. This substitution eliminates mechanical components while achieving the same variable inductance function through electronic control, thereby extending tuning range without proportionally increasing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an operational amplifier-based simulated inductor as an intermediary element between the control voltage and the resonant circuit. This intermediary converts voltage control signals into the appropriate current-voltage relationship that simulates inductive behavior, enabling electronic tuning without direct mechanical intervention in the resonant circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If moving parts are used in variable inductors to achieve frequency tuning, then frequency control is improved, but reliability decreases due to mechanical wear and limited applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency controlVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent completely replaces mechanical variable inductor structures with an electronic simulated inductor using operational amplifiers and passive components. This substitution eliminates all moving parts, mechanical wear, and associated reliability issues while maintaining the ability to vary inductance for frequency control. The electronic implementation is more suitable for integrated circuit applications and miniaturized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8253504B2Electronically variable oscillator
Publication Date: 2012.08.28 ACP ADVANCED CIRCUIT PURSUIT AG
  • US8253504B2 patent drawing
  • US8253504B2 patent drawing
  • US8253504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable simulated inductor comprises an integrator connected to receive the voltage across the input to the circuit. The output of the inductor is connected to a control terminal of a transconductor connected across the input of the circuit. The gain of the transconductor is electronically controllable in order to control the inductance of the circuit. An oscillator using a variable simulated inductor and a piezoelectric resonator connected in parallel is also provided.