Electronic Key Battery Cover With Child-Resistant Dual Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic keys with removable covers are susceptible to being easily opened by children or infants, posing a risk of battery extraction and potential ingestion.

Innovation Solution

The electronic key features a cover securing mechanism that requires multiple operations in different directions to remove the cover, including a first lock that bends in a direction intersecting the cover's rotation and a second lock that engages through end pieces, along with stoppers to control rotation, making it difficult for children or infants to open.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the cover is made easily removable by simple rotation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety against children or infants is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cover removalVSAvoidsafety against children
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cover securing mechanism is divided into multiple independent locking elements (first locking element and second locking element) that operate in different directions. The first locking element prevents rotation, while the second locking element prevents disengagement, creating segmented security that children cannot easily overcome

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multi-directional operation requirements by implementing locks that respond to different types of movements (rotation vs. disengagement). This adds dimensional complexity to the opening operation, transforming a simple single-direction problem into a multi-dimensional challenge that is difficult for children to solve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a cover securing mechanism with multiple locking elements is implemented, then the safety against children is improved, but the device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against childrenVSAvoidcover securing mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple locking functions are merged into a single integrated cover structure. The first and second locking elements are both incorporated into the cover itself, eliminating the need for separate locking mechanisms and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cover serves multiple functions simultaneously: it protects the battery, provides sealing, and incorporates both locking elements for security. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional components, thereby reducing device complexity while improving safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260024392A1Electronic key
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 KK TOKAI RIKA DENKI SEISAKUSHO
  • US20260024392A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024392A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024392A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic key includes a case, a cover, and a cover securing mechanism. The case includes a battery receptacle for accommodating a battery. The battery serves as a power supply when performing authentication through wireless communication with a communication peer. The cover is configured to close the battery receptacle. The cover securing mechanism is configured to secure the cover to the case. The cover is removed from the case by operating the cover securing mechanism in two or more different operation directions.