Electronic Label Guidance for Interference-Free Order Picking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing Pick To Light (PTL) system in picking systems experiences inefficiencies due to pickers interfering with each other and manual control issues, leading to missed or improperly triggered electronic label indicators, which reduces picking efficiency and causes mutual interference when multiple orders are picked simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A target object determination method and apparatus that uses a handheld terminal to determine a current location based on positioning electronic labels, identify target objects within a preset distance range, and send guiding instructions to accurately trigger electronic label indicators, thereby improving picking efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic label indicators for all to-be-picked goods are turned on simultaneously, then pickers can see all available items, but pickers interfere with each other reducing picking efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility of to-be-picked goodsVSAvoidpicking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates electronic label indicators selectively based on the picker's current location and the specific order being fulfilled. Instead of uniformly turning on all indicators, only the relevant indicator for the nearest to-be-picked item is activated, creating localized guidance that prevents interference between multiple pickers while maintaining visibility of needed items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If picker manually triggers electronic label indicator when far away from to-be-picked goods, then picker has time to prepare, but picker may miss the to-be-picked goods due to excessive distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control flexibilityVSAvoiddistance determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the picker's location via positioning electronic labels and automatically determines when to activate the next indicator based on distance thresholds. This feedback mechanism eliminates the need for manual timing judgments by the picker, ensuring the indicator is activated at the optimal moment when the picker is at the correct distance from the to-be-picked goods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If picker triggers electronic label indicator when excessively close to to-be-picked goods, then picker can see the item clearly, but system latency causes the indicator to not turn on in time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and prepares to activate the electronic label indicator in advance based on the picker's approaching velocity and distance. By anticipating when the picker will reach the optimal viewing distance and pre-calculating the activation timing, the system compensates for its own latency, ensuring the indicator turns on precisely when needed rather than when the picker is already too close.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If picker manually determines trigger occasion for electronic label indicator, then picker has control over timing, but picking process becomes complex and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control capabilityVSAvoidpicking process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic location tracking, distance calculation, and indicator activation timing without requiring manual intervention from the picker. The positioning electronic labels and control system work together to autonomously determine the optimal trigger moment, eliminating the complexity of manual timing decisions while maintaining operational simplicity for the picker.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4708123A1Target object determination method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 HEMA (CHINA) CO LTD
  • EP4708123A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4708123A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4708123A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Embodiments of this specification provide a target object determination method and apparatus. The method is applied to an object scanning device, and includes: determining, in response to an object selection instruction, a current location according to a positioning electronic label; determining, according to the current location and object attribute information of initial objects, a target object electronic label of a target object whose distance to the current location falls within a preset distance range; and sending a guiding instruction to the target object electronic label, to cause the target object electronic label to guide, according to the guiding instruction and in a preset guiding manner, a user to select the target object. According to the method, based on a handheld terminal location, an electronic label indicator corresponding to a commodity in an order within a specific distance range may be triggered to be turned on, thereby avoiding a problem of mutual interference caused when electronic label indicators corresponding to all commodities in a plurality of orders are turned on simultaneously in a case that picking is performed for the plurality of orders, and improving the commodity picking efficiency.