Multi-Factor Authentication for Electronic Locks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic locks in enterprise and infrastructure settings face security breaches due to reliance on single-factor authentication methods, which can be easily compromised, especially in managing access to multiple entry points and high-security areas, leading to unauthorized access and potential theft or sabotage.

Innovation Solution

An access management system that employs multi-factor authentication, involving a user management module, role management, and lock management, using a combination of first and second factor authentication data, such as unique passcodes, biometric signatures, and secret keys, to securely control access to electronic locks across multiple entry points, with features like time-based authorization and virtual perimeter activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If single-factor authentication methods (PIN, card, biometric) are used in electronic locks, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened as tokens and PINs may be easily shared with unauthorized users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is segmented into multiple independent factors (something you know like PIN, something you have like token, something you are like biometric). Each factor provides a layer of security, and the combination of factors creates a robust authentication system that cannot be easily compromised by sharing a single credential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A server acts as an intermediary between the electronic lock and the user, managing the multi-factor authentication process. The server receives authentication data from various factors, validates them against stored credentials, and controls the locking mechanism, providing centralized security management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If physical keys are used for access control, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened as physical keys may be misplaced or easily duplicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical key system is replaced with an electronic authentication system that uses multiple factors (PIN, token, biometric). This substitution eliminates the physical vulnerabilities of keys (misplacement, duplication) while maintaining ease of operation through electronic interfaces and automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If smart locks with single-factor authentication are deployed to manage multiple entry points, then productivity is improved, but security is worsened due to susceptibility to security breaches

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic lock system is designed with universal multi-factor authentication capabilities that can be deployed across multiple entry points and managed through a centralized server. This allows the system to maintain high productivity by enabling access control at many locations while enhancing security through consistent multi-factor authentication enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If access rights are frequently issued to third parties with varying durations, then adaptability is improved, but security is worsened due to administrative lapses leading to breaches

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The access rights system is made dynamic through time-based authorization that automatically activates and deactivates access permissions according to predetermined time periods. This dynamic control allows flexible adaptation to different user needs (handyman for single visit, cleaner for longer term) while eliminating administrative lapses through automated expiration, thereby maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11244524B2System and method for managing electronic locks
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 IGLOOHOME PTE LTD
  • US11244524B2 patent drawing
  • US11244524B2 patent drawing
  • US11244524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An access management system and a method for managing electronic locks are disclosed. The system comprises a user management module configured to provision access rights to an authorized user associated with the electronic lock, wherein a first factor authentication data is configured to be associated with the authorized user. The system comprises a server arranged in wireless communication with the access management system and each electronic lock associated with each of the plurality of entry points. The server is configured to perform a first factor authentication and a second factor authentication of the user for releasing the electronic lock for entry to the authorized user of the entry point.