Electronic Lock Automatic State Control via User Profile

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic lock systems require manual operation using physical keys or priority remotes, which can be inconvenient, especially when hands are occupied, and often do not interoperable across different devices, such as car and house locks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates and updates a user profile based on interactions with electronic locks, allowing automatic state changes of locks without user intervention, using a processing device to receive and store information about lock operations and determine state changes based on the user profile.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual operation using physical keys or priority remotes is used, then the lock can be operated, but the ease of operation deteriorates when hands are occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The lock system performs automatic operations without requiring user intervention. The processing device automatically determines when to change the lock state based on user profiles and contextual information, making the system self-serving and eliminating the need for manual key insertion or remote operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring user profiles that define automatic lock state changes based on contextual conditions. When conditions are met (e.g., user approaches location, specific time), the lock automatically executes predetermined actions without waiting for user request.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate priority remotes or applications are used for different locks, then each lock can be controlled, but the adaptability deteriorates due to lack of interoperability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinteroperabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing device serves multiple functions: it manages user profiles, stores contextual information, determines automatic lock state changes, and communicates with various lock types. This universal approach allows a single device to control multiple locks across different locations without requiring separate priority remotes or applications for each lock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If automatic operation is implemented, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback loops where the processing device continuously monitors contextual information (location, time, user behavior) and adjusts lock operations accordingly. User profiles are updated based on observed behavior patterns, creating a feedback mechanism that improves automatic operation while managing complexity through adaptive learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9892580B2Operating electronic lock automatically based on user profile
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9892580B2 patent drawing
  • US9892580B2 patent drawing
  • US9892580B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of techniques for automatically operating an electronic lock based on a user profile of a user are disclosed. In one example implementation according to aspects of the present disclosure, a computer-implemented method may include receiving an indication of the user changing a state of the electronic lock. The method may further include storing information associated with the user changing the state of the electronic lock. The method may further include generating, by a processor, the user profile based on the information associated with the user changing the state of the electronic lock. The method may further include determining, by the processor, that the state of the electronic lock should be changed based on the user profile. The method may further include automatically changing the state of the electronic lock when it is determined to change the state of the electronic lock based on the user profile.