Electronic Nose Model Selection for Precise Analyte Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective methods for accurately identifying and quantifying aromas in various applications, such as food quality assessment and chemical detection, due to limitations in sensor specificity and combination analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing an electronic nose with thin film gas sensors and machine learning models to predict analytes, concentrations, and natural language descriptors from sensor outputs, enabling accurate aroma characterization and detection of abnormalities in additive manufacturing and food quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple gas sensors are used to improve aroma detection capability, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearoma detection precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the aroma detection task into multiple sensor components, each detecting different gas components. The sensor array includes multiple types of gas sensors (e.g., metal oxide semiconductors, conducting polymers) that segment the complex aroma profile into detectable individual components, improving overall detection precision while managing complexity through functional specialization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic nose system is designed with multi-functional capability to detect various types of aromas across different applications (food quality, chemical detection, additive manufacturing). The same sensor array and processing system universally handle diverse aroma profiles, reducing the need for application-specific hardware modifications and managing system complexity through standardized multi-use architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to analyze sensor outputs, then aroma characterization accuracy is improved, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearoma characterization accuracyVSAvoidmodel training and processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models offline using extensive aroma datasets before deployment. The models are trained in advance to recognize aroma patterns, so during actual operation, the pre-trained models quickly process sensor outputs without requiring extensive real-time computation, thus reducing operational processing time while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses machine learning models that create computational representations (copies) of aroma patterns from training data. These model copies enable the system to recognize and classify aromas by comparing sensor outputs against learned patterns, achieving high characterization accuracy through pattern matching rather than complex real-time analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If sensor outputs are analyzed to detect abnormalities in additive manufacturing, then manufacturing quality control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing quality controlVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring sensor outputs during additive manufacturing and comparing them against expected aroma profiles. When deviations indicating abnormalities (e.g., material decomposition, contamination) are detected, the system provides feedback signals to alert operators or adjust manufacturing parameters, improving quality control through closed-loop monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic nose system acts as an intermediary between the additive manufacturing process and quality control decision-making. The sensor array and machine learning model serve as intermediate components that translate complex manufacturing conditions into interpretable aroma-based quality indicators, simplifying the overall quality control system while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides precise aroma prediction and detection capabilities, enhancing food quality assessment and chemical identification, and enabling real-time monitoring of additive manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of thin film gas sensors... receive output from each of the plurality of thin film gas sensors caused by unknown one or more analytes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas sensor detection: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11975491B2Chemical detection system with at least one electronic nose
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 UT BATTELLE LLC
  • US11975491B2 patent drawing
  • US11975491B2 patent drawing
  • US11975491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for predicting one or more analytes based on outputs from thin film gas sensors is provided. The system may comprise an electronic nose (e-nose). The e-nose may comprise the gas sensors and a first processor. The system may further comprise a second processor. The second processor may be configured to receive the output from each of the gas sensors, evaluate a prediction accuracy using an evaluation parameter of each of a plurality of models which are trained and tested and select a model from among the plurality of models to deploy based on a comparison of the evaluation parameter for each of the plurality of models and use the same. The second processor may also receive, an output of each of the gas sensors caused by unknown one or more analytes; and predict, using the deployed model, the one or more analytes that causes the output.