Electronic Threading Control for Tubular Connections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drilling operators face challenges in accurately controlling the rate of assembly of tubular connections during make-up and break-out, leading to potential stalling or damage due to inadequate torque and speed management, which increases intervention and reduces efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system with a drive assembly controller that manages vertical and rotational movements of tubulars, transitioning through modes like stabbing, threading, torquing, and tripping, using user-defined values and a PID controller to maintain optimal axial force and torque, reducing human intervention and errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual control of tubular assembly rate is used, then operator flexibility is maintained, but assembly precision deteriorates due to inability to maintain optimal torque and speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an electronic control system that uses sensors to detect torque and speed, and a controller to automatically adjust drive parameters. This substitution enables precise maintenance of assembly rates within optimal parameters while reducing operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by using sensors to continuously monitor torque and speed during tubular assembly, comparing actual values against target parameters, and automatically adjusting the drive assembly to maintain optimal assembly rates throughout the threading process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated threading control is implemented, then assembly rate control improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly rate controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a multi-functional control system that handles multiple aspects of tubular assembly including torque monitoring, speed control, mode transitions (stabbing, threading, torquing, tripping), and safety functions within a single integrated system, reducing overall complexity compared to separate control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically monitors and adjusts assembly parameters without continuous operator intervention. The system self-regulates torque and speed within optimal ranges, transitions between operational modes autonomously, and maintains assembly rates within specified parameters through automated feedback control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If human intervention is reduced, then operational efficiency improves, but system reliability may worsen due to automation errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses sensors to continuously monitor torque and speed, providing real-time feedback to the controller. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect deviations from optimal parameters and automatically correct them, maintaining high reliability through continuous closed-loop control rather than relying solely on pre-programmed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an electronic control system that uses sensors to detect torque and speed, and a controller to automatically adjust drive parameters. This substitution enables precise maintenance of assembly rates within optimal parameters while reducing operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7665533B2Electronic threading control apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2010.02.23 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US7665533B2 patent drawing
  • US7665533B2 patent drawing
  • US7665533B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system to control a threading operation includes a first tubular and a second tubular, wherein the first tubular and the second tubular include corresponding thread profiles. The system further includes a drive assembly configured to rotate the second tubular with respect to the first tubular, wherein vertical and rotation movements of the drive assembly are controllable through a drive assembly controller, and wherein the drive assembly controller is configured to operate in a threading mode when the second tubular is threaded with the first tubular.