Electronic To-Do Lists for Clinical Event Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare professionals face challenges in remembering and documenting clinical events during complex procedures, leading to potential errors and inefficiencies in compliance with standards and protocols, especially in long or multi-clinician operations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of electronic to-do lists with timer functionality in computerized healthcare environments, allowing clinicians to track and document events, set reminders, and share tasks among multiple users, providing a centralized and accurate method for event management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If clinicians work from memory of events during complex clinical care processes, then they can maintain workflow speed, but error rate increases and compliance reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow speedVSAvoidcompliance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates to-do lists with all required clinical events and documentation tasks before the clinical care process begins. This preliminary preparation ensures that clinicians have a complete checklist ready, eliminating the need to remember events and ensuring compliance requirements are met without slowing down the actual clinical workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The to-do list system acts as an intermediary between compliance requirements and clinical practitioners. It translates mandatory standards and protocols into actionable, tracked tasks that clinicians can follow, thereby ensuring reliability and compliance without requiring clinicians to manually remember or track each requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If clinicians manually document events during the clinical care process, then documentation completeness improves, but time consumption and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation completenessVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic documentation generation by capturing data from the electronic health record and automatically populating to-do list items with relevant clinical information. This self-service capability reduces manual documentation effort while maintaining completeness, as the system automatically tracks and records events as they occur in the clinical workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback to clinicians about documentation status through the to-do list interface. Completed events are automatically updated and tracked, giving immediate feedback on what has been documented and what remains, thereby ensuring completeness without requiring excessive manual effort or time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If clinicians use traditional to-do lists without timer functionality, then task tracking is simple, but timing accuracy and event monitoring precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask tracking simplicityVSAvoidtiming accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the simplicity of traditional to-do lists with automated timer functionality. The to-do list interface remains easy to use for tracking tasks, while embedded timers automatically monitor time-critical events. This combination maintains ease of operation for task management while adding precise timing measurement capabilities without requiring separate tracking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple clinicians participate in the same clinical care process without coordinated event tracking, then workflow flexibility is maintained, but event completion tracking reliability and communication efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow flexibilityVSAvoidevent completion tracking reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The to-do list system is designed to be universally accessible and functional across multiple clinicians simultaneously. Each clinician can access and update the same to-do list, and the system automatically coordinates updates and notifications. This multi-functional design maintains workflow flexibility for each clinician while ensuring reliable, coordinated event completion tracking across the entire team.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8543413B2To-do lists in computerized healthcare environment
Publication Date: 2013.09.24 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US8543413B2 patent drawing
  • US8543413B2 patent drawing
  • US8543413B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Electronic to-do lists are provided in a computerized healthcare environment for managing and documenting events during clinical care processes. A to-do list includes events that may need to be completed and, in some cases, documented during a clinical care process. The to-do list may be generated in response to a selection of a to-do macro including data associated with a number of clinical events that need to be completed during the clinical care process. As events are completed by clinicians during the process, the to-do list may be used to document the completion of the event. As such, clinicians may readily identify events that have been performed, as well as events that have yet to be performed. In some cases, a clinical event in a to-do list may include associated details, which may be used to populate information in an electronic record when the clinical event is indicated as completed.