Electropermanent Magnet Motors for Low-Speed Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing micromotors and microactuators face challenges in providing efficient electromechanical energy conversion at high torque and low speed, especially at small dimensions, with conventional motors experiencing significant losses due to friction, magnetic demagnetization, and resistive heating, leading to low efficiency at low speeds and zero efficiency when stalled.

Innovation Solution

The use of electropermanent magnets in motors and actuators, where current pulses change the magnetization of the magnets, allowing for continuous motion and precise control of position or speed without continuous electrical power, reducing losses by minimizing current flow through windings and utilizing materials with different coercivity for efficient energy storage and conversion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional permanent magnet motors are used, then continuous torque is produced, but resistive heating losses increase at low speeds and zero speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous torqueVSAvoidresistive heating losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The motor uses periodic pulsed current applied to electropermanent magnets to change their magnetization state, rather than continuous current. The electropermanent magnets are switched between magnetized and demagnetized states in pulses, producing torque only when needed, thereby eliminating continuous resistive heating losses at low or zero speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the magnetic parameter of the electropermanent magnets dynamically by applying current pulses that alter their magnetization state. This allows the motor to produce torque only when the magnets are in the appropriate magnetized state, rather than requiring continuous current flow, thus reducing energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If conventional permanent magnet motors operate at low speeds, then torque is maintained, but efficiency decreases due to continuous power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetorqueVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor employs periodic pulsed current to switch electropermanent magnets between magnetized and demagnetized states, producing torque only during the pulsed intervals when needed. This eliminates continuous power consumption while maintaining torque at low speeds, significantly improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The electropermanent magnets maintain their magnetized state without continuous power input, using the applied current pulses only to change state when torque is needed. This self-holding capability allows the motor to maintain torque at low speeds without continuous power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If electropermanent magnets are used with pulsed current, then resistive heating losses are reduced, but continuous torque production becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistive heating lossesVSAvoidcontinuous torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The motor uses periodic pulsed current to switch electropermanent magnets between magnetized and demagnetized states in a sequence that produces continuous torque. By carefully timing the pulses to multiple magnets around the rotor, continuous torque is achieved while maintaining low energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The motor divides the torque production task across multiple electropermanent magnets distributed around the rotor. By sequentially switching different magnets between magnetized and demagnetized states, continuous torque is produced through the segmented contribution of multiple magnets rather than requiring continuous current in a single magnet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Force

If speed-reducing power transmission is added to achieve high torque at low speed, then torque is increased, but device complexity and transmission losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh torqueVSAvoidtransmission stages
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the need for mechanical speed-reducing transmissions with an electromagnetic approach using electropermanent magnets and pulsed current. The motor directly produces high torque at low speeds through controlled magnetization switching, eliminating complex mechanical transmission stages and associated losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high efficiency at low speeds and small dimensions, reducing resistive heating losses and maintaining efficiency even at zero speed, making it suitable for microrobotics and programmable matter applications.

Implementation Method 1

at least one coil that is wound around each electropermanent magnet and configured to pass current pulses that affect the magnetization of the magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Passing current through (the coil of) these electropermanent magnets changes the magnetization of the materials inside, storing energy in the magnetic materials, changing the force they exert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectropermanent magnetism: Electropermanent Magnet

Data Source

PatentUS9525330B2Electropermanent magnet-based motors
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US9525330B2 patent drawing
  • US9525330B2 patent drawing
  • US9525330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electropermanent linear actuator has a stator, forcer, drive circuitry, and feedback control mechanism. The stator includes at least one electropermanent magnet with a coil that passes current pulses that change the magnetization of the magnet, which change persists after current is removed. The forcer moves with respect to the stator in response to the persistent changes in magnetization. Drive circuitry controls the position or speed of the actuator by controlling the timing, magnitude, and/or shape of the current pulses. The voltage and duration of pulses are of sufficient magnitude to cause the magnetization change to persist after cessation of current, with voltage and current returning substantially to zero between pulses. The feedback control mechanism determines, based on actuator velocity or position, when the next current pulse should be issued, pulse issuance being timed so that the actuator will continue to move throughout the absence of applied current between pulses.