Integrated Electroshock Module in Mobile Device Case

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current self-defense devices for mobile devices are often forgotten or inaccessible during emergencies, failing to provide timely protection against violent attacks.

Innovation Solution

A mobile device case integrated with an electroshock module and a battery, allowing for quick and non-lethal incapacitation of attackers, while also providing protection against device damage from drops or collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate self-defense devices (pepper spray, alarms) are carried, then self-defense capability is provided, but accessibility and reliability in emergencies deteriorate due to being forgotten or left behind

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-defense capability availabilityVSAvoidaccessibility in emergencies
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a self-defense module (containing electroshock device, battery, and control circuit) with a mobile device case into an integrated unit. This merging ensures the self-defense capability is always accessible whenever the mobile device is carried, eliminating the problem of forgetting or leaving separate self-defense devices behind. The case becomes both a protective enclosure and a functional self-defense system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile device case is designed to serve multiple functions: it protects the mobile device from physical damage, provides extended battery power through an integrated battery, and delivers self-defense capability through the electroshock module. This multi-functionality ensures the device is always available and useful in various situations, including emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If electroshock module is integrated into mobile device case, then self-defense effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-defense effectivenessVSAvoidcase structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The self-defense system is segmented into distinct functional modules: the electroshock delivery mechanism, the power supply battery, and the control circuitry. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall integration into the case, making the complex system manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electroshock module is nested within the mobile device case structure. The battery and control circuits are also integrated within the case boundaries. This nesting approach consolidates multiple components into a single compact unit, reducing the apparent complexity while maintaining full functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Strength

If case provides comprehensive protection, then device safety is improved, but portability and ease of carrying deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective capabilityVSAvoidcase weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The case provides enhanced protection (increased strength and durability) specifically in areas most vulnerable to damage, such as the corners and edges, rather than uniformly thickening the entire case. This localized reinforcement maintains overall portability while providing adequate protection where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The case utilizes composite materials that offer high strength-to-weight ratio, combining durability with lightness. This allows the case to provide comprehensive protection against drops and collisions without significantly increasing the overall weight, maintaining ease of carrying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution offers a readily accessible and effective means of self-defense, enhancing user safety by combining an electroshock system with a protective mobile device case, ensuring rapid deployment and protection against physical harm.

Implementation Method 1

The battery within the housing is configured to supply electrical power to the electroshock module and the mobile device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBattery (electricity): Battery (electricity)

Implementation Method 2

The electroshock module within the housing is configured to release an electric shock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric shock: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS10605575B2Self-defense device for handheld electronic devices
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 YELLOWJACKET
  • US10605575B2 patent drawing
  • US10605575B2 patent drawing
  • US10605575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A two-part self-defense apparatus is disclosed. The apparatus is configured for use with a handheld electronic device such as a cellular phone. A removable protective case configured for installation on the handheld electronic device is one part of the apparatus, and a self-defense module containing a self-defense weapon is the other part. The two parts may be connected to form a unitary working unit, and may be disconnected when the self-defense module is not needed or desired. In a preferred embodiment, the self-defense weapon is a stun gun and the handheld electronic device is a cellular phone.