Electrostatic Atomizer Feedback Control for Consistent Spraying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrostatic atomizers lack effective monitoring and control mechanisms to optimize the spraying process and prevent errors, leading to inconsistent results and potential inefficiencies in liquid application.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using an electronic control system with sensors to detect voltage and current intensity at the atomizer nozzles and high-voltage source, allowing for real-time monitoring and intervention to improve the spraying process, including features like acoustic and haptic feedback, and adjustable parameters for optimal liquid delivery and nozzle alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electrostatic atomization is used for liquid application, then spraying efficiency and coverage are improved, but lack of monitoring and control mechanisms leads to inconsistent results and potential errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespraying efficiencyVSAvoidspray consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by using sensors to detect voltage and current at the atomizer nozzles and high-voltage source, then feeding this information back to the control electronics. This allows the system to monitor spray conditions in real-time and make adjustments to maintain consistent operation, directly addressing the reliability issue while preserving the productivity benefits of electrostatic atomization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual monitoring and adjustment mechanisms with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors and electronic circuits to detect and respond to spray conditions. This substitution of mechanical/control systems with electronic automation enables consistent monitoring and control, improving reliability without sacrificing the efficiency of the electrostatic atomization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If manual operation without monitoring is used, then device complexity is reduced, but error prevention and process optimization are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoiderror prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control electronics are designed to autonomously monitor spray parameters and automatically intervene to correct deviations or prevent errors. The system serves itself by using sensors to detect conditions and the control electronics to make adjustments without external intervention, thereby improving reliability while keeping the user interface simple and the overall device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor voltage, current, and other spray parameters, and the control electronics automatically adjust operating conditions based on this feedback. This self-regulating mechanism prevents errors and optimizes performance without requiring complex manual control systems, balancing reliability with acceptable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time monitoring with sensors is implemented, then spray process control and consistency are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray process consistencyVSAvoidelectronic control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control electronics are designed to perform multiple functions: monitoring voltage and current at different points, detecting spray conditions, making adjustments to maintain consistency, and providing user feedback. By consolidating these multiple functions into a single integrated control system, the patent improves spray consistency while avoiding the need for separate complex subsystems for each function, thereby managing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the monitoring and control functions into an integrated electronic control system where sensors, signal processing circuits, and actuation controls are merged into a unified architecture. This consolidation improves spray consistency through comprehensive monitoring while reducing the complexity that would arise from having separate independent systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If intervention mechanisms are added to improve spray pattern, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray pattern precisionVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control electronics use feedback from sensors monitoring spray parameters to automatically adjust operating conditions and maintain precise spray patterns. This automated feedback control achieves manufacturing precision without requiring complex manual adjustment mechanisms, as the system self-corrects based on real-time sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms with electronic control that adjusts spray parameters through electrical signals to the electrostatic atomizer. This substitution achieves precise spray pattern control through electronic means rather than mechanical adjustments, improving precision while keeping the control system relatively simple and maintenance-free.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise control and monitoring of the atomization process, enhancing the spraying result, preventing errors, and ensuring consistent and efficient application of liquids, such as cosmetics and paints, while minimizing material waste and maintaining hygiene standards.

Implementation Method 1

electrostatic atomization encompasses all atomization processes that atomize liquids by means of high-voltage effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic atomization: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

In particular, electrohydrodynamic and electrokinetic effects are also included in this concept of atomization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrohydrodynamic effect: Electrohydrodynamics

Implementation Method 3

sensors in the control electronics to detect the voltage and/or current at at least one of the atomizer nozzles, and/or using sensors in the control electronics to detect the voltage and/or current at the high-voltage source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical measurement: Ohm's Law

Data Source

PatentEP3612314B1Method for controlling an electrostatic atomiser for liquids
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 J WAGNER GMBH
  • EP3612314B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3612314B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3612314B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for controlling an electrostatic atomiser (101) for liquids (103), the atomiser (101) comprising a liquid tank (110) and a device (111) for conveying liquid (103) out of the liquid tank (110), a high voltage source (109) and at least one atomiser nozzle (102b, 102d, 102g) for atomising liquid (103). The at least one atomiser nozzle (102b, 102d, 102g) is connected to the high voltage source (109). Sensor means (S102-1, S102-2) of control electronics (108) are used to detect voltage and/or current at at least one of the atomiser nozzles (102a - 102h) and/or sensor means (S109-1, S109-2) of the control electronics (108) are used to detect voltage and/or current at the high voltage source (109).