Electrostatic Chuck Conductive Path for Charge Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electrostatic chucks face issues with charge accumulation leading to workpiece sticking, damage, and processing interruptions due to inadequate grounding, which limits throughput and causes non-uniformities in plasma doping ion implanters.

Innovation Solution

An electrostatic chuck with a conductive path covering the workpiece-contacting surface, featuring a surface resistivity range of 10^8 to 10^12 ohms per square, utilizing diamond-like carbon coatings and a conductive grounding layer to effectively dissipate excessive charge without damaging the workpiece.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If spring loaded grounding pins are used to dissipate charge, then charge accumulation is reduced, but the number of contact points is limited and sharp edges can damage the workpiece

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge dissipation effectivenessVSAvoidworkpiece damage from sharp edges
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The grounding function is segmented from discrete pin contacts to a continuous conductive path that covers the entire workpiece-contacting surface, allowing charge dissipation across multiple distributed points rather than limited pin contacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A conductive coating layer acts as an intermediary between the workpiece and the grounding system, providing a smooth contact surface that prevents workpiece damage while effectively conducting charge away

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If higher conductivity is used in the main field area, then charge dissipation improves, but clamping force may be reduced due to charge leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge dissipationVSAvoidclamping force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Different conductivity levels are applied to different regions: the gas seal ring area has high conductivity for effective charge dissipation, while the main field area has controlled conductivity to maintain clamping force while allowing sufficient charge dissipation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The surface resistivity in the main field area is optimized to a specific range (10^8 to 10^12 ohms per square) that balances charge dissipation needs with clamping force requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If throughput is increased in plasma doping ion implanter, then productivity improves, but excessive charge accumulation occurs leading to non-uniformities and arcing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocessing uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The conductive path is pre-established on the electrostatic chuck surface before workpiece processing, enabling continuous charge dissipation during high-speed processing without waiting for charge accumulation problems to develop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively neutralizes surface charge, reducing wafer sticking and handling issues while maintaining clamping force, preventing damage and ensuring uniform processing.

Implementation Method 1

a conductive path covering at least a portion of a workpiece-contacting surface of a gas seal ring of the electrostatic chuck, the conductive path comprising at least a portion of an electrical path to ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

Electrostatic charge may accumulate on the workpiece and also on the platen surface supporting the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic charge accumulation: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS9692325B2High conductivity electrostatic chuck
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 ENTEGRIS INC
  • US9692325B2 patent drawing
  • US9692325B2 patent drawing
  • US9692325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, there is provided an electrostatic chuck comprising a conductive path covering at least a portion of a workpiece-contacting surface of a gas seal ring of the electrostatic chuck, the conductive path comprising at least a portion of an electrical path to ground; and a main field area of a workpiece-contacting surface of the electrostatic chuck comprising a surface resistivity in the range of from about 108 to about 1012 ohms per square.