Electrostatic Fins for MEMS Micromirror Field Redistribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional digital micromirror devices (DMDs) experience undesirable micromirror dynamics due to localized peak electrostatic fields, leading to over-rotation and vertical hinge oscillation, which can result in destructive shorting and inefficient electrostatic coupling.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of electrostatic fins disposed inwardly from the micromirror, orthogonal to the hinge axis, which redistribute electrostatic fields and enhance coupling between conductive layers, allowing for increased micromirror thickness without compromising reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional DMDs are used with standard micromirror structure, then the device can operate, but localized peak electrostatic fields are formed causing undesirable micromirror dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicromirror operation reliabilityVSAvoidlocalized peak electrostatic fields
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing electrostatic fins at specific locations on the micromirror structure. These fins are positioned at the edges of the micromirror where electrostatic fields are most concentrated, creating a non-uniform distribution of electrostatic coupling elements. This localized modification redistributes the electrostatic field density, preventing peak field concentrations while maintaining overall micromirror functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The micromirror structure is segmented by adding discrete electrostatic fins rather than using a uniform structure. The fins divide the electrostatic interaction into multiple localized points along the micromirror edges, transforming a continuous electrostatic field problem into discrete, manageable segments. This segmentation allows better control over field distribution and reduces harmful peak fields.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If micromirror thickness is increased to improve structural integrity, then strength is improved, but electrostatic coupling efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicromirror structural strengthVSAvoidelectrostatic coupling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses the thickness-coupling tradeoff by extending the electrostatic interaction into a third dimension through vertical fins. Instead of relying solely on the horizontal mirror surface area for electrostatic coupling, the fins provide additional vertical surface area that enhances coupling without increasing the mirror thickness. This dimensional extension allows thicker mirrors to maintain efficient electrostatic coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The electrostatic fins concentrate the electrostatic coupling function at specific locations rather than distributing it uniformly across the mirror surface. By placing fins at strategic positions where field lines are most dense, the structure achieves efficient coupling even with increased thickness, as the fins create localized regions of enhanced electrostatic interaction that compensate for the reduced field penetration through thicker material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-generated harmful factors

If electrostatic fins are added to redistribute fields, then field distribution is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic field distributionVSAvoidmicromirror structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex field redistribution problem is solved by segmenting the solution into simple, discrete fin elements. Rather than attempting to redesign the entire micromirror structure, the patent divides the correction function into multiple identical or similar fin segments positioned at different locations. This modular approach simplifies manufacturing while achieving the complex goal of field redistribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electrostatic fins act as intermediary elements between the electrodes and the micromirror surface. These fins mediate the electrostatic interaction by providing an intermediate surface that shapes and redistributes the field lines. This intermediary structure simplifies the overall system by decoupling the electrode design from the mirror design, allowing each to be optimized independently while the fins handle the field distribution function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced electrostatic field coupling improves cross-over transition speed and latching reliability, reducing the likelihood of destructive shorting and increasing the efficiency of micromirror operation.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more electrostatic fins are separated from the conductor by a first air gap and separated from the one or more electrodes by a second air gap that is different than the first air gap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic field redistribution: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS7362495B2Electrostatic fins for a MEMS device
Publication Date: 2008.04.22 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US7362495B2 patent drawing
  • US7362495B2 patent drawing
  • US7362495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A MEMS device includes a hinge that is disposed outwardly from a substrate and capable of at least partially supporting a conductor that is disposed outwardly from the hinge. The conductor being capable of pivoting about a first axis. The device also includes one or more electrostatic fins that are disposed inwardly from and in contact with the conductor. The one or more electrostatic fins being disposed substantially along a second axis that is different than the first axis. The MEMS device further includes one or more electrodes that are formed outwardly from the substrate and inwardly from the conductor. The one or more electrodes being separated from the conductor by a first air gap. The one or more electrodes also being separated from the one or more electrostatic fins by a second air gap that is different than the first air gap.