Electrostatic Latent Image Formation via Local Exposure Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for forming electrostatic latent images struggle to achieve high-quality images, particularly in forming microscopic characters like white-on-black inverted characters, due to inadequate control over the latent-image electric field vector, leading to toner adhesion issues and image degradation during the developing process.

Innovation Solution

An electrostatic latent image forming method and apparatus that adjust the exposure conditions of adjacent areas to increase the electric field intensity of non-irradiated regions, preventing toner adhesion by modifying the duty cycle and modulated current for black dots adjacent to white dots, thereby enhancing the latent-image electric field vector without requiring complex edge detection or character recognition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional exposure methods are used to form electrostatic latent images, then the imaging process is simple, but the image quality deteriorates due to toner adhesion and inadequate electric field control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidexposure condition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating exposure conditions between irradiated areas and non-irradiated areas. Specifically, the exposure condition for irradiated areas is set to a first value, while the exposure condition for non-irradiated areas adjacent to irradiated areas is set to a second value that is different from the first value. This local differentiation enables precise control of the electric field vector in different regions, preventing toner adhesion in non-irradiated areas while maintaining proper image formation in irradiated areas, thereby improving image quality without requiring complex additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying the exposure condition parameter (such as exposure amount or exposure timing) between different areas of the photosensitive element. By changing the exposure condition from a first value to a second value in non-irradiated areas adjacent to irradiated areas, the patent controls the electric field vector magnitude and direction, preventing toner adhesion issues while maintaining simple exposure system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the electric field intensity is increased to prevent toner adhesion, then toner adhesion is reduced, but the image density control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoner adhesion preventionVSAvoidimage density control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by applying different exposure condition values to different areas: the first exposure condition value is applied to irradiated areas to maintain proper image density, while the second exposure condition value is applied to non-irradiated areas adjacent to irradiated areas to increase electric field intensity and prevent toner adhesion. This spatial differentiation of exposure parameters allows simultaneous optimization of both toner adhesion prevention and image density control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively increasing the electric field intensity only in non-irradiated areas adjacent to irradiated areas, rather than uniformly across the entire photosensitive element. This targeted approach prevents toner adhesion where it is most problematic while maintaining proper image density in irradiated areas, avoiding the need to excessively increase exposure conditions everywhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If exposure conditions are adjusted to improve microscopic character formation, then image quality improves, but the complexity of exposure control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicroscopic character reproductionVSAvoidexposure control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves improved microscopic character reproduction by implementing local quality control through area-based exposure condition differentiation. By identifying irradiated areas and non-irradiated areas and applying appropriate exposure condition values to each, the patent enhances electric field vector control at the microscopic level without requiring complex additional control systems or hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by utilizing the inherent area information (irradiated vs. non-irradiated) already present in the imaging process to automatically determine the appropriate exposure condition values. The system leverages the existing exposure pattern to guide the differentiation of exposure conditions, eliminating the need for separate complex control mechanisms while achieving improved microscopic character formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in higher-quality electrostatic latent images and improved image stabilization, particularly for microscopic characters, by effectively preventing toner adhesion and maintaining image density, suitable for high-resolution imaging.

Implementation Method 1

a photosensitive element that has a surface charge; forming, on the surface of the photosensitive element, an electrostatic latent image that has a pattern where there are an irradiated area and a not-irradiated area in a mixed manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

adjusting an exposure condition of an irradiated area that is included in the irradiated area and is adjacent to the not-irradiated area so that an electric field intensity of an electrostatic latent image that corresponds to the not-irradiated area is increased so as to prevent adhesion of a developer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS9372433B2Electrostatic latent image forming method, electrostatic latent image forming apparatus, and image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 RICOH CO LTD
  • US9372433B2 patent drawing
  • US9372433B2 patent drawing
  • US9372433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrostatic latent image forming method for forming, on an image carrier, an electrostatic latent image that has a pattern where there are an irradiated area and a not-irradiated area in a mixed manner, the electrostatic latent image forming method comprises; adjusting an exposure condition of an irradiated area that is included in the irradiated area and is adjacent to the not-irradiated area so that an electric field intensity of an electrostatic latent image that corresponds to the not-irradiated area is increased so as to prevent adhesion of a developer, and irradiating the image carrier with light under the adjusted exposure condition.